MUSICAL CHAIRS: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission took a rightward shift under former President Donald Trump’s time in office, opting for structural changes that slowed the pace of litigation and pushed the commission away from some its work on gender identity discrimination. Now with the commission locked under a Democratic majority until 2026 , experts weighed in on what a second Trump term would mean for an agency that has issued new guidance and regulations under Chair Charlotte Burrows, while facing a tougher litigation environment. “I am sure we will continue to see attempts to roll that back, to minimize or do away with the guidance,” said Gaylynn Burroughs, vice president for education and justice at the National Women’s Law Center. “We might also see attempts to limit or hamstring the EEOC’s ability to enter into consent decrees, which are really important for making larger changes that impact a larger group of workers.” Trump would likely appoint Commissioner Andrea Lucas as chair , much like he did when he named chairs Victoria Lipnic and Janet Dhillon. The changes likely wouldn’t amount to immediate seismic policy changes, but could allow Lucas to put a lid on the EEOC’s DEI efforts, which she has been especially critical of in light of the Supreme Court’s move to overturn affirmative action. “While Andrea might not be able to make a lot of things happen right out of the box without a majority of votes, there are certainly things she could stop from happening,” said James Paretti, a former EEOC chief of staff who is now a shareholder at employment law firm Littler. Lucas declined POLITICO’s request for comment, while Burrows did not respond. A Republican chair on the commission also would accelerate the rulemaking headwinds agencies have faced after the high court's Loper Bright ruling — which overturned agencies' ability to interpret ambiguous statutes — by giving the GOP another firewall against its opposition to the EEOC’s implementation of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a bipartisan bill that angered conservatives by designating abortion as a medical condition employers would be required to accommodate. However, advocates of the PWFA plan to continue their litigation to support its abortion-related provisions no matter who wins Tuesday’s election. “That was the intent of the law, and that is something that we're focused on ensuring is a reality,” Burroughs said. Lawrence has more for Pro subscribers. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, Nov. 4. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Don’t expense reports give you anxiety? Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and lukenye@politico.com. Follow us on X at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories
|
No comments:
Post a Comment