Friday, July 28, 2023

Where Should You Keep Your Earnings: US Banks?

Imran Amed’s Weekly Briefing: 🏃🏾💸 Luxury Slowdown? Not So Fast.

The luxury industry was bracing itself for a week packed full of Q2 earnings from all the major players — LVMH, Kering, Prada, Zegna and Hermès — a signal of how the sector is performing amid declining spending by aspirational customers in the key US market.
ADVERTISEMENT
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY: SATURDAY, JULY 29, 2023


This is Imran Amed. Welcome to my new weekly briefing, where I share the must-read stories from The Business of Fashion each Saturday.

LONDON — The luxury industry was bracing itself for a week packed full of Q2 earnings from all the major players — LVMH, Kering, Prada, Zegna and Hermès — a signal of how the sector is performing amid declining spending by aspirational customers in the key US market.

Industry heavyweight LVMH was first to report. The fashion and leather goods group still grew by 21 percent in Q2, driven by momentum in China and Japan, and the return of tourist spend in Europe. But its overall results did not meet consensus expectations, and there was a marked weakness in the US where Q2 sales contracted by one percent.

"We have a situation where, by and large, the aspirational customer is suffering a bit," CFO Jean-Jacques Guiony acknowledged to investors. "We are experiencing drops with entry price products, with online sales, with second tier cities — which is a clear sign that your aspirational customer is not shopping as much as they used to."

Over at rival Kering, the news was more dire. Gucci grew by only 1 percent in the second quarter, missing analyst expectations of 4.2 percent. Saint Laurent and Bottega Veneta also showed slowing growth of 7 percent and 3 percent respectively. And revenues from Kering's "other brands" — which include crisis-prone Balenciaga — actually shrank by 1 percent.


But these lacklustre results were eclipsed (smart PR move!) by the announcement that Kering is acquiring 30 percent of Valentino for €1.7 billion ($1.9 billion) with an option to acquire 100 percent of the brand within five years. This is a boon for Kering as it looks to bolster its luxury brand portfolio to drive growth (smart acquisition move!).

Technically, Valentino didn't report its results this week, but the Kering announcement did underscore that Valentino did more than €1.4 billion in revenue in 2022, delivering €350 million in EBITDA. Kering's investment came in at a €5.7 billion valuation.

These results are impressive and reflect the deft management of Mayhoola chairman Rachid Mohamed Rachid and CEO Jacopo Venturini, as well as the creativity of Pierpaolo Piccioli. The transaction also reinforces the point that smaller Italian brands like Valentino are still at a structural disadvantage when competing with the big groups to reach the next milestone. Kering could now light a fire under Valentino to take it to €5 billion in revenue.

What's also remarkable is that they managed to surprise the market. I had not heard a peep about this anywhere, an increasingly rare occurrence with big fashion news. Well done to the bankers for keeping their mouths shut and to Kering and Valentino for managing to keep fashion's biggest deal of the year a secret.

Hermès was last to report its results this week, but came in first in the league tables. With a focus on high-net-worth customers, the ultra-luxe brand zoomed past all its rivals and consensus expectations, delivering 27.5 percent organic growth in Q2, including more than 20 percent growth in the US market.

As all the results rolled in this week, I couldn't help but notice it was some of the (relatively) smaller Italian brands that delivered some of the best performances of the first half of the year: Prada, Zegna and Moncler. Could they be the next acquisition targets as industry consolidation continues? Here are my key highlights from H2 results — and the brands you should be watching:

→ READ MORE

Here are more top picks from our analysis on fashion, luxury and beauty:

1. Big Brands Are Taking Back Unwanted Clothes. Where Do They Go? For anyone who missed it, an edifying new investigation by the Changing Markets Foundation showed how companies like H&M and C&A that are taking back unwanted clothes for resale and recycling may simply be shipping problems of overconsumption elsewhere. Instead of resold or recyled, these recycled clothes can end up downcycled, destroyed or dumped. The report embedded bluetooth tracking devices to find out where the clothes ended up. I wish BoF had thought of doing that! A very smart idea and worth your time to read. The journeys these clothes went on, often across multiple continents, were astonishing to take in.


2. Adidas Swamped With $565 Million in Orders for Unsold Yeezy Shoes. The BoF team spent quite a bit of time this week talking about the news of Adidas' blockbuster liquidation of leftover Yeezy shoes following the collapse of its partnership with Kanye West. Seems Yeezy fans are willing to look past its creator's misdeeds to snap up what's left of the sneakers, which will not be manufactured again.


3. Where Did Luxury's Aspirational Shoppers Go? After years of fuelling growth at luxury brands, the consumer segment — which typically opts for entry-level accessories — pulled back sharply on spending in the first quarter of 2023. BoF unpacks what happened and what's to come.


4. LVMH Inks Blockbuster Olympics Deal. LVMH made a much anticipated, but unusually timed mid-summer announcement that it is doing a big Paris 2024 Olympics partnership. The tie-up will see many of the group's brands integrated into the proceedings, which begin one year from now.


5. Can Gap Be Barbie-fied? Recently Marc Bain and Sarah Elson wrote about how Vintage Gap is more popular than current Gap, underscoring the challenge for Gap's new CEO, the architect behind Barbie's sensational comeback which has overtaken our social fees in recent months. Can he replicate the playbook to save a $15 billion fashion empire? I hope so. I worked at the Gap when I was 15 years old and still have a soft spot for the brand and what it stands for.


The BoF Podcast

Last week, Kering announced a new leadership structure and one of the biggest winners in the shuffle was Francesca Bellettini who is now deputy ceo of brand development in addition to her role as CEO of Saint Laurent. That makes her arguably the most powerful female executive in the luxury sector.

It's a smart move. Francesca has both the business chops and creative sensibility required to be a fashion CEO, and she has a very clear model for how to build luxury brands

This week on The BoF Podcast, I'm pleased to bring back this archive interview with Francesca from BoF VOICES 2018. Listening to it again, there are lessons for all of us on how to lead with purpose and authenticity.

Enjoy your weekend!

Imran Amed, Founder, CEO and Editor-in-Chief, The Business of Fashion

To receive this email in your inbox each Saturday, sign up to The Daily Digest newsletter for agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice that you won't find anywhere else.

BoF CAREERS
Tiffany & Co. Are Hiring

Tiffany & Co. are currently hiring for a Team Lead Diamond Expert and a Sr. Analyst, Financial Planning & Analysis (Leases) in New Jersey, a Jeweler - Level 3 and a Supervisor - Manufacturing in Rhode Island and a Marketing Manager FP&A and a Fine Jewelry Polisher in New York.

Founded in 1837, Tiffany & Co. manufactures and markets jewellery, watches and luxury accessories. The luxury jewelry and specialty retailer has more than 300 retail stores worldwide and a workforce of more than 13,000 employees, with nearly 5,000 artisans to cut Tiffany diamonds and craft jewellery in the company's own workshops.

VIEW JOBS

A challenge to all male investors…

Male investors MISS this...
 

It makes me laugh.

It doesn't matter how good my track record is.

It doesn't matter that I started with just $800 and managed to grow that account in a sizable nest egg, thanks to this straightforward technique.

Most people will continue to ignore me simply because I'm a woman, and trading is supposed to be a "man's game."

That's fine. You can keep doing what you're doing. But, if you're willing to "trade like a girl," it could put a lot more potential money in your pocket.

See for yourself... if you can handle it:

74-Year Old Grandma Shares Her Surprisingly Straightforward Investing Secret

Wendy Kirkland

P.S. A natural disaster destroyed my business and crushed my nest egg. This retirement hack is what saved me from the bread line...

 
TradeWins Logo
 

© 2023 Tradewins Publishing. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us

The information provided by the newsletters, trading, training and educational products related to various markets (collectively referred to as the "Services") is not customized or personalized to any particular risk profile or tolerance. Nor is the information published by Universal Financial Independence Inc., ("Universal") a customized or personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or invest in particular financial products. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and investing involve substantial risk and is not appropriate for everyone. The actual profit results presented here may vary with the actual profit results presented in other Universal Financial Independence, Inc. publications due to the different strategies and time frames presented in other publications. Trading on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Other than the refund policy detailed elsewhere, Universal does not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using the Services. Universal disclaims any and all liability for any investment or trading loss sustained by a subscriber. You should trade or invest only "risk capital" - money you can afford to lose. Trading stocks and stock options involves high risk and you can lose the entire principal amount invested or more. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or trading signals will result in profits or that they will not produce losses.

Some profit examples are based on hypothetical or simulated trading. This means the trades are not actual trades and instead are hypothetical trades based on real market prices at the time the recommendation is disseminated. No actual money is invested, nor are any trades executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. Also, the hypothetical results do not include the costs of subscriptions, commissions, or other fees. Because the trades underlying these examples have not actually been executed, the results may understate or overstate the impact of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Universal makes no representations or warranties that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown. No representation is being made that you will achieve profits or the same results as any person providing a testimonial. No representation is being made that any person providing a testimonial is likely to continue to experience profitable trading after the date on which the testimonial was provided, and in fact the person providing the testimonial may have subsequently experienced losses. Wendy Kirkland's experiences are not typical. Wendy Kirkland is an experienced investor and your results will vary depending on risk tolerance, amount of risk capital utilized, size of trading position, willingness to follow the rules and other factors.



This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by wendy@tradewins.com

TradeWins Publishing Corp.528 North Country Rd.St. James, NY 11780

How Much Can You REALLY Make Trading Just 30 Minutes A Week?

                                                                            Replace A Full-time Salary With Just 30 Minutes Of Trading A...