INSULIN LITIGATION DEEP-DIVE — As Congress weighs legislation to rein in pharmacy benefit managers, a lawsuit accusing PBMs and insulin makers of racketeering and unfair trade practices is growing in federal court. Eighty states, cities, counties, school boards and unions have joined litigation consolidated in a New Jersey district court against the three major pharmacy middlemen — CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx — and three insulin manufacturers. Since Oct. 1, at least four counties and two school boards have signed on, and more are expected in the coming weeks. Plaintiffs have been divided into three groups — state attorneys general, self-funded payers like local governments and third-party payers — to manage the proceedings. Most recently, unsealed filings paint a clearer picture of the counties’ arguments and the industry’s response. Payers’ problem: The complaint focuses on the web of payments PBMs extract from manufacturers to list their products on formularies and from payers for their services. County payers claim it’s a “multibillion-dollar price-fixing scheme” that was “borne from the coincidence of both groups’ unchecked power” and led to them being allegedly overcharged for insulin, which millions of Americans with diabetes use. The counties say their contracts require that rebates the PBMs negotiate with manufacturers must “pass through” to them, which payers can use to either lower other costs or pass on to their employees. But as they’ve bartered those guarantees, they claim PBMs “began to relabel rebates as ‘discounts,’ ‘credits,’ and ‘fees’” — payments that don’t flow to payers and fall beyond the scope of what payers can audit under their contracts. “The counties knew that the Manufacturers paid rebates, creating a gap between list and net prices, but believed that all rebates would be passed to them,” they wrote in a reply brief to the drugmakers’ motion to dismiss. The industry responds: The PBMs responded that counties knew they had bargained for other payments from drugmakers. “The purported ‘scheme’ is a direct attack on the Counties’ own contracting decisions from ten years ago,” they wrote. The three insulin makers, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, suggested that the counties are pursuing a “new theory” in the suit — essentially a “breach of contract claim” — after acknowledging they knew about the rebate system. “It has nothing to do with insulin’s list prices, with the alleged impact of those prices on consumers, or with Manufacturers at all, who were not parties to — and have never seen — Payers’ contracts with PBMs,” they said in a filing. What’s next: Discovery is ongoing across the three tracks. It’s unclear when a judge will rule on the motions to dismiss, which have been fully briefed. IT’S WEDNESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. Neither of your morning hosts cares about postseason baseball anymore. Send tips and 2025 baseball hype to David Lim (dlim@politico.com or @davidalim) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com or @Gardner_LM). |
No comments:
Post a Comment