BIOTECH REVIEW DEAL — Lawmakers are floating a compromise to break an impasse on legislation that would hamper Chinese biotech firms’ ability to do business in the U.S., three people familiar with the negotiations told Ben. The BIOSECURE ACT, which the House passed 306-81 in September, would halt federal contracts for companies partnering with specific Chinese biotech companies and calls out five specific firms. Because the firms partner with U.S. pharmaceutical companies, supporters of the measure warn they could gain access to Americans’ genomic data, which the Chinese government could then access under the country’s intelligence laws. Named companies have denied their data could be compromised. The proposal: POLITICO first reported that the potential compromise would allow the listed firms to undergo a review process to determine whether punitive measures should be imposed. One of the people familiar with the situation said Republicans offered the compromise to Democrats but haven’t won them over yet. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who will take over as chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in January, opposed the bill on the grounds that it would advantage some biotech companies over others. And there’s also significant Democratic opposition. Seventy-nine of those who voted no in the House were Democrats. It’s unclear whether the move would appease skeptics like Paul or Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), ranking member of the Rules Committee. At least one of the targeted firms continues to fight the bill, Ben reports. “Any proposal that keeps the names in the bill still would have major constitutional problems as it lacks due process protections,” Complete Genomics said in a statement. FDA FOOD FIGHT — Senators on the HELP Committee grilled FDA Commissioner Robert Califf on Thursday about his agency’s food and beverage regulations and how they impact rising rates of obesity and health issues, Daniel reports. But one issue that didn’t come up much: “I hope I get asked about the weight-loss drugs,” Califf said about GLP-1s more than an hour into the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing. Califf suggested the drugs could be important tools in intervening in foods he believes are addictive. But he acknowledged the need to address the root causes of the rise in obesity. Califf made several pitches to lawmakers for the FDA’s future. He nodded to a recent decision from the Supreme Court — likely the court striking down Chevron deference, which gave more latitude to agencies to interpret ambiguous laws — saying lawmakers might consider putting programs they want to see in legislation instead of leaving them to agencies. He also asked for more funding. “If we had a bigger budget,” he said, “we would have studied a lot more things.” Califf demurred when asked about his plans after the FDA, per POLITICO’s Marcia Brown. “I’m 73 years old. Golf is in my future,” Califf joked to reporters. “No, I’ll be around. I have some special projects I’m interested in pursuing.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment