VANCE VS. WALZ — Vice presidential candidates Tim Walz and JD Vance will face off today in the only vice presidential debate in an election where health care issues, including abortion and affordability, have taken center stage. Both Vance, a Republican senator from Ohio, and Walz, the Democratic governor of Minnesota, will likely try to establish themselves on the national stage and talk up their potential administrations if elected. Here are four health care issues we’ll be watching for: — How the candidates might explain their abortion policies: Walz, like his running mate Vice President Kamala Harris, is a staunch supporter of abortion rights and has the record to prove it: Early last year, he signed a bill ensuring the state’s existing protections on abortion remained in place. Vance has aligned with his running mate, former President Donald Trump, on saying abortion should be left to the states and that Trump would veto a national abortion ban. Vance was, however, forced to backtrack when Trump said in a September presidential debate that he hadn’t discussed a national ban with Vance. — How they might clarify their in vitro fertilization policies: After Trump angered some conservatives by calling himself a “leader” on IVF and proposing free coverage of the procedure, it could be up to Vance to further explain how a Trump administration might cover the expensive procedure. Walz, meanwhile, could face questions on how he has represented his personal experiences with infertility. Vance has accused Walz of lying about his wife using IVF when she used a slightly different procedure known as intrauterine insemination to conceive. Both sides of the aisle are trying to cement a position and policy on the procedure after an Alabama court decision declared frozen embryos should be considered people. — How Trump/Vance might replace the Affordable Care Act: While the Trump campaign has offered few details on its plan to replace the Affordable Care Act, Vance has floated some ideas, including a plan to adjust insurance premiums based on health status: Healthy people would pay lower premiums compared with those who are sicker, who would pay higher premiums. In a “National Review” op-ed, Brian Blase, president of the conservative Paragon Health Institute, argued that Vance’s idea would allow health plans to tailor their services to specific populations. KFF, a health policy research group, said those high-risk pools, which existed before the ACA, were often costly, excluded preexisting condition coverage and capped enrollment. — How Walz might discuss health care affordability: Both Harris and Walz have taken on corporate interests in health care when Harris was California attorney general and Walz Minnesota governor. Walz backed down from a proposed health care affordability plan when the Mayo Clinic threatened to take its investments elsewhere. “I’ll be curious to see if that comes up,” Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, told Pulse. WELCOME TO TUESDAY PULSE. Happy 100th birthday to former President Jimmy Carter. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to ccirruzzo@politico.com and bleonard@politico.com and follow along @ChelseaCirruzzo and @_BenLeonard_.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment