Editor's Note: Weekly Tax is a weekly version of POLITICO Pro's daily Tax policy newsletter, Morning Tax. POLITICO Pro is a policy intelligence platform that combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. PROGRAMMING NOTE: Morning Tax will not publish from Thurs. Dec. 24-Friday Jan. 1. We'll be back on our normal schedule on Monday Jan. 4. ALRIGHT, SO HERE'S THE DEAL: Congress being Congress, it took until Sunday night — less than a week before Christmas — to secure an agreement for more pandemic relief (and to fund the government, no less). But secure that relief they did, as Pro Tax's Brian Faler noted, though lawmakers still have to vote on it. So let's look at what policymakers did on taxes and what it might mean for the future. PPP Deductibility: Perhaps the most touch and go aspect from a tax perspective has been whether this package would allow businesses to write off normal business expenses paid for by forgiven Paycheck Protection Program loans. In the end, the answer was yes — though there was still talk on Sunday that there would also be limits on which companies can claim the deductions. (Earlier in the week, one of the going rumors had been that only companies that received PPP loans of up to $150,000 would be able to get the write-offs.) So it's a victory for business groups who have been pushing for PPP deductibility — but also kind of amazing that Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who now has less than a month left in office, was able to mount such stiff resistance against the deductions when the idea had pretty solid bipartisan support on the Hill. Finally: The groups pushing for PPP deductibility have acknowledged that basically allowing tax write-offs for items already paid for by the government wouldn't make sense in normal circumstances, but stressed these weren't normal times for lots of companies struggling to get by (and that the government would be undercutting its own relief efforts by forcing businesses to pay those taxes). The response: " Once we agree that it is double dipping, the question then becomes 'is this a good way to provide stimulus?'" said Bill Gale of the Brookings Institution. "Given the evidence that so much of PPP loans went predominantly to advantaged firms and not sufficiently to small businesses, I would argue that it is not a particularly good way to stimulate and that, for the same amount of money, Congress could do a lot of other good things — aid to the states, for example," Gale added. (Remember: There's no budget impact with PPP deductibility, because the scorekeepers assumed that the deductions would be allowed. But some estimates say that business owners would get tens of billions of dollars with the deductions.) HEY, THERE — and welcome to the final Weekly Tax of 2020. At least we still have a Christmas Star coming. I mean, what else are you going to do when you can't row on the Schuylkill? Today marks 171 years since the founding of the Skaters Club of the City and County of Philadelphia — the first figure skating club in the U.S. 2020 has been hard enough. Don't freeze us out. Email: bbecker@politico.com, alorenzo@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com and teckert@politico.com. You can also reach us on Twitter at @berniebecker3 , @aaronelorenzo, @tobyeckert, @Brian_Faler, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax. |
No comments:
Post a Comment