ALL EYES ON THE FLRA: President Joe Biden secured a Democratic majority on the Federal Labor Relations Authority in July, when the Senate confirmed Anne Wagner to lock in the party’s 2-1 advantage on the three-member panel. Now the FLRA, which adjudicates labor disputes within non-postal federal agencies, could be poised to revisit a Trump-era decision that hampered immigration judges’ ability to organize and may shape workforce disputes as Republicans eye sweeping changes to the federal workforce. During President-elect Donald Trump’s first term, the FLRA effectively busted the National Association of Immigration Judges union, arguing that judges could not collectively bargain because they are managers who craft policy, rather than employees. The FLRA's D.C. regional office will hold a hearing Tuesday revisiting the ruling. The looming hearing and frustration among the judges creates an overlap among two issues that the incoming Trump administration has made central to its policy agenda: immigration and reshaping the federal workforce. Republicans have been critical of the rate that immigration judges process cases and even went as far as calling for its union to be decertified in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 plan, along with arguing the Executive Office for Immigration Review should be part of DHS rather than the Justice Department. Trump’s first administration also clashed with judges and implemented case quotas they were required to meet or risk termination. Biden removed the quotas imposed on judges early in his first term. “If they’re serious about taking care of the backlog, why would you hire more judges and have an acrimonious relationship with the folks that are in charge of hearing these cases?” Matt Biggs, president of the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, a parent union of the NAIJ, told Shift. Trump's transition team did not respond to Shift's request for comment. There are more than 3 million pending cases in immigration courts, worsened by the increase in apprehensions along the southern border during Biden’s term. Biggs argues that if the Trump administration is committed to reducing the backlog and improving the immigration process, his officials should work closely with judges within NAIJ rather than going after their bargaining rights. “They can really learn how these immigration courts work from the inside out, and try to improve efficiencies within these courts while protecting due process protections,” he said. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, Dec. 9. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and lukenye@politico.com. Follow us on X at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment