IN THE SHORT TERM: Time is running out for short-term Pell to pass in the 118th, but proponents of the policy are hopeful for the future. Linda McMahon, nominee for Education secretary, has spoken favorably about the grants. Little is known about her plans for the department and her experience in education is thin, but she has penned an op-ed throwing her support behind the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act, sponsored by Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Bobby Scott (D-Va.), Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), and Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.). “Many degree programs have lost sight of their mission. And their one-size-fits-all solution to workforce development has become outdated,” she wrote. “Our educational system must offer clear and viable pathways to the American Dream aside from four-year degrees.” Despite having bipartisan agreement on the program, it historically has had difficulty making its way through the legislative process. Lawmakers also tend to disagree about what kind of guardrails should be put on short-term Pell to ensure that federal dollars don’t go toward low-quality training programs. Some higher education groups are against the program altogether. They argue that the federal government already pays for a lot of short-term programs, and that they don’t have strong economic returns. Now with a Republican controlled Congress and McMahon’s support, some policy advocates in favor of short-term Pell think it could have a better shot at coming to fruition. Kevin Stump, the vice president of the Education Design Lab a nonprofit that designs different types of education-to-workforce models, said part of the reason people give pause about short-term Pell is because there is a lack of data around short-term programs. But more local leaders are finding a need for it, he said, pointing to state-level initiatives like Propel NC and Texas House Bill 8. “We’re optimistic because short-term Pell has enjoyed a great deal of bipartisan support in all kinds of communities that both the new administration and Congress are ready to act,” Stump said. Kim Cook, the CEO of National College Attainment Network, said she could support short-term Pell with specific guardrails for quality, but worries about what it could mean for Pell funding in general. “What does that do to Pell’s funding? Cook said. “Would a significant bump in use for short-term programs rocket us toward a short fall we have worked around already?” IT’S MONDAY, DEC. 9. WELCOME TO WEEKLY EDUCATION. I’m your host, Rebecca Carballo. Let’s talk: rcarballo@politico.com. The team: Bianca Quilantan at bquilantan@politico.com, Juan Perez Jr. at jperez@politico.com and Mackenzie Wilkes at mwilkes@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment