DELHI’S HARD BARGAINER: Goyal’s tough tactics on behalf of India most recently frustrated other members of the WTO at the group’s 13th Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi. Like former President Donald Trump, Goyal “is a showbiz personality and deliberately provocative,” said a former EU official who negotiated with the Indian trade chief for years. “He loves cliffhanging negotiations where he can sabotage and then come to the rescue on a white horse at the last minute,” they said. “He’s done that several times.” This week, India and the EU are holding their ninth round of trade talks, resuming negotiations that were put on hold for spring elections in India and in Europe. He also will restart negotiations with the U.K. — now under a Labour government — in the autumn. For more, click on our profile here. WTO AG TALKS SHOW SIGNS OF LIFE: Two negotiating groups, one representing African nations and the other major agricultural exporters, are working together to develop joint proposals to help forge an agricultural agreement by the WTO’s next ministerial conference in late 2025 or early 2026. Following the August break, the African Group and the Cairns Group of agricultural exporting countries have resumed weekly technical level discussions aimed at finding common ground and “draft modalities” — WTO jargon for how farm subsidy or tariffs cuts would be made. Turkish Ambassador Alparslan Acarsoy, the chair of the WTO’s Agriculture Committee, told members last week he detected a widespread desire to resume negotiations as soon as possible. Efforts to launch comprehensive farm trade talks at the WTO’s 13th Ministerial Conference earlier this year in Abu Dhabi failed, largely because of India’s insistence that its top issue — public stockholding — be resolved first. Acarsoy, at an informal meeting of the Ag Committee, said members stressed the importance of working on modalities, rather than wasting time on a more conceptual “work program” that failed to produce results at MC13. However, some members, such as Russia, object to the modalities approach as premature, according to a Geneva-based trade official. The chair outlined two suggestions for moving forward. One would be to establish informal small groups of members to work on various topics, with each group led by key proponents of reform. The second would be for Acarsoy to appoint facilitators to lead negotiations on specific issues, including domestic support, public stockholding and the special safeguard mechanism, export restrictions and competition, and market access. Acarsoy said cotton could either be incorporated into domestic support discussions or remain under the cotton “quad-plus” negotiation framework. The latter is a forum to address concerns raised by four African countries about the trade-distorting effect of foreign cotton subsidy programs. It also includes Australia, Brazil, China, the EU, India, Pakistan and the U.S. Other recommendations for the ag trade talks include setting milestones in the lead-up to MC14, adopting a comprehensive approach, and considering the relevance of past mandates when defining priorities, the Geneva-based trade official said. PERU DISPUTE, ECUADOR TALKS, BRAZIL DIALOGUE: USTR and the Commerce Department were busy last week on a number of fronts in Latin America. USTR asked the Peruvian government to verify that five timber shipments exported to the United States from Peru complied with applicable Peruvian laws and regulations. That enforcement action under provisions of the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement intended to fight illegal logging brought a cheer from Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee. Assistant USTR for environment and natural resources Kelly Milton was in Ecuador to discuss illegal logging and a slate of other environmental issues. And here in Washington, Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade Marisa Lago and Brazilian Secretary of Foreign Trade Tatiana Prazeres co-hosted the 22nd Plenary of the U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue. The two sides signed a memorandum of understanding to cooperate on good regulatory practices.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment