Scientists studying cancer in the lab often take biopsies of patients’ cancer cells to clone them. The process is two-dimensional: The cloned cultures are grown on a flat surface like a petri dish, so unlike cancer cells in humans that form tumors, they spread out as they grow. While scientists have grown 3D tumors in gel or using scaffolding, those tumors aren't consistent from lab to lab. Growing consistent 3D tumors would enable scientists to study more types of cancer, including rarer and understudied cancers. Bill King, an engineering professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Grainger College of Engineering, leads a project funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health to figure out how to improve the process. Erin caught up with King to learn more. The interview has been edited for length and clarity. How can using manufacturing techniques improve cancer research? It starts with robotics, which we’re going to use to seed the tumors, so we can have precise placement of a controlled number of cells. While they incubate, we’re going to measure them using different kinds of imaging technology. Conventional microscopy, but also infrared spectroscopy that gives us information about the chemical composition. The key innovation is that we’re imagining tumor model growth as a digital manufacturing platform. You’re starting with breast cancer. Why? We’re starting with a commonly studied type of breast cancer. We’re going to use that to build the technology and then as the project matures, we’re going to expand into other kinds of breast cancers and then into other kinds of cancer beyond that. How far can you go? We’re going to have a platform where we can do any kind of cancer. We’re reducing the barriers to creating 3D clones of new kinds of cancers, even cancers that are rare or that appear in only one patient. That’s not possible today. The lack of automation and of scalable technologies for growing cancers in the laboratory has created a situation where only a small number of cancers have been studied. Rare cancers are much less studied. This is a little more “moon-shotty” than most academics work on.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment