The current U.S. national debt is a little over $35 trillion and rising. That's nearly $105,000 per person in America. People are starting to realize there are only two ways we can get our national debt under control. One way is to raise taxes massively. The other way is to cut government spending massively. Since neither of those are going to happen, we're going to have to inflate away the debt. This means putting pressure on the U.S. Dollar, and because gold is tied to the U.S. Dollar, the price of gold should go up. I believe this phenomenon is why gold is going to take off. And if it doesn't go higher now, it's never going higher. So if you're considering investing in gold, it's crucial to understand how it's valued so you can see your potential return on investment. One vital factor to look at is the cost per ounce. Cost per ounce is the most critical item in any gold stock. The cost per ounce Is crucial because gold is typically traded and priced on a per-ounce basis, making it a common benchmark for assessing its market value. In essence, the cost per ounce serves as a key metric for gold's market value and helps investors know the potential return on investment. For example, if you look at the two big gold companies Newmont and Barrick, the cost per ounce is somewhere around $1200-$1400 for those stocks. That's what it costs to get the metal out of the ground and to the market, and then buy new property to discover new gold to replace what they've taken out. YOUR ACTION PLAN Gold has been surging in 2024 and the cost per ounce is what you want to focus on to assess the value of gold stocks. I recently came across a company with an eye-opening cost per ounce ratio in Catalyst Cash-Outs. Unlike Newmont and Barrick, this company's cost per ounce for gold is only $500. That's good for a $2000 profit margin! Because of this, I could see its stock reaching $100 or more in 5-10 years, and it could be a stock you buy for your grandkids. Click here to unlock this once-in-a-generation gold play in Catalyst Cash-Outs. |
No comments:
Post a Comment