NOT WITHOUT A FIGHT: Southern Republican lawmakers are devising additional policy levers to stymie unionization efforts in the region in light of a resurgence of organized labor that recently resulted in a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee gaining representation. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a bill last week to revoke economic benefits for companies that voluntarily recognize unions, and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp signed a similar bill last month. Tennessee led the way on the strategy last year, and the pressure point could make its way to other GOP-controlled states in the future. Ivey escaped the same fate as Gov. Bill Lee, as workers at a Mercedes plant in Alabama rejected an organizing bid Friday. “The workers in Vance have spoken, and they have spoken clearly! Alabama is not Michigan, and we are not the Sweet Home to the UAW,” Ivey said in a statement. However, the moves highlight how union-friendly workers in a historically hostile region are beginning to meet resistance from state governments in light of growing unionization in the U.S. “In America, we respect our workforce and we do not need to pay a third party to tell us who can pick up a box or flip a switch,” Ivey warned last month along with five other Southern governors. Critics of voluntary recognition and so-called card check say that they do not always accurately reflect union support among workers, and that elections are a better measure. Still, left-leaning experts don’t believe that the cudgel against employers will put a lid on the growth of organized labor in the region — due to potential conflicts with federal law. "Federal labor law still applies to every worker in these states who's in a private sector job, and workers are organizing actively, despite these new state laws and will continue to do so," Jennifer Sherer, director of the Economic Policy Institute’s State Worker Power Initiative, told Lawrence. Sherer believes the bills could be preempted by lawsuits from workers who believe the new laws interfere with their rights or from businesses who feel the legislation unfairly threatens their access to subsidies they otherwise qualify for. For example, in 1986, the Supreme Court struck down a Wisconsin law that barred companies from doing business with the state if they violated the National Labor Relations Act multiple times. The court ruled that the Wisconsin law was preempted by the NLRA and conflicted with the federal statute. “There may come a time when there are instances of those companies beginning to think twice because they don't want to be in a state that's going to try to block that choice,” Sherer said. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, May 20. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Finding out your team is part of an investigation for receiving $100,000 bonuses is a tough way to start your season. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and lukenye@politico.com. Follow us on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment