Republicans are officially back in control of both chambers of Congress for the first time since 2019. Now, they’re facing the hard part: governing. With the GOP aiming to push a sweeping array of economic policy changes through Congress after President-elect Donald Trump takes office later this month, MM looks at some of the major questions hanging over the opening weeks of the 119th Congress in the world of financial services. Can new committee leaders work together? The new Congress has brought an almost complete turnover atop the committees overseeing Wall Street and financial policy, the Senate Banking and House Financial Services panels. Both committees are set to be led by first-time chairs, Sen.Tim Scott(R-S.C.) and Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.). Hill said last month that he and Scott have a “terrific” relationship, but it will be subject to trial by fire as they work to push through a sweeping agenda, including cryptocurrency legislation and a rollback of Biden-era regulations. Another X factor will be the Democrats’ committee leadership. Hill has long been known as a champion of bipartisanship, and some Democrats celebrated his ascension. But it remains to be seen how much the GOP will work across the aisle with a governing trifecta. Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is set to take over as the Senate Banking ranking member and Rep. Maxine Waters of California will again lead House Financial Services Democrats, putting two stalwart progressives in charge of the party’s approach to financial policy. They are at odds with Hill and Scott on most major issues before the committees, though both have found common ground with Republicans on some matters in the past. Waters and Warren “are very dyed-in-the-wool progressives,” said Rep. Frank Lucas of Oklahoma, a senior Republican on House Financial Services who ran against Hill to lead the panel. “My two committee chairmen — House and Senate — have to come to grips with that as we move forward.” How will Democrats handle Trump 2.0 nominees? Democrats on Capitol Hill adopted a wartime posture during the first Trump administration. This time around, there are signs some may take a different approach. Party leaders have kept quiet about controversial nominees, and some Democrats have signaled openness to backing the president-elect’s more mainstream picks. Keep an eye on whether nominees for key economic policy positions — like Treasury secretary selection Scott Bessent and SEC chair hopeful Paul Atkins — draw Democratic votes. Some names to watch: Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York who is friendly with the cryptocurrency industry, has signaled she is open to backing Atkins. Moderates like Sen. Mark Warner could be willing to back Bessent; the Virginia Democrat met with Trump’s Treasury pick on Tuesday and previously said he has "heard some good things” about him. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has praised Trump’s pick for Commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick. What can Wall Street get in reconciliation? Capitol Hill is abuzz with a GOP debate over how to advance a sweeping border, tax and energy package through the reconciliation process, which would allow it to clear the Senate without Democratic votes. With the bill expected to contain tax legislation and other key parts of the GOP’s legislative agenda, it will become a major lobbying focus for Wall Street firms and executives who cheered on Trump’s expiring 2017 tax cuts. It could also become a vehicle for other financial priorities. “Every individual in this building who has a piece of legislation they want to pass in the calendar year 2025 wants a seat on that bill,” Lucas said. “But this reconciliation package has to pass, so you can’t let it be overloaded.” Will Democrats recalibrate on crypto? Democrats ended 2024 divided over cryptocurrency policy — and the issue is set to resurface in a big way this year. A surprising number of Democrats last year supported GOP-led legislation to overhaul how digital assets are regulated, which Republicans are expected to push again this Congress. While some Democrats like Warren remain opposed to changes that would legitimize digital assets, an influx of new industry-friendly lawmakers — and a mountain of crypto campaign cash that is looming over the 2026 elections — could lead the party to more broadly recalibrate its approach to the issue. It’s WEDNESDAY — If you’ve got news tips, suggestions or feedback, hit Sam up at ssutton@politico.com and Jasper at jgoodman@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment