Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Energy permitting push on the fritz

Presented by Centrus Energy: Your guide to the political forces shaping the energy transformation
Dec 11, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Power Switch Newsletter Header

By Arianna Skibell

Presented by 

Centrus Energy

Electric power lines are pictured attached to a transmission tower.

Electric power lines are attached to the transmission tower along the power grid on Sept. 28, 2023, in the Everglades, Florida. | Joe Raedle/AFP via Getty Images

The prospect of a bipartisan deal to speed up energy permitting is growing dim as negotiators run short on both time and legislative vehicles, writes Kelsey Brugger.

Lawmakers have been trying to overhaul the nation’s energy permitting laws for years. After countless false starts, a glimmer of hope emerged this summer with a bipartisan proposal from independent Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming.

The bill aims to streamline the permitting process for adding energy to the grid, whether it's clean power or fossil fuels — a process that can take years (almost 20, in some instances). While both Democrats and Republicans are in favor of such a move in general, the devil is in the details.

Republicans want to retool the National Environmental Policy Act to speed up environmental reviews for fossil fuel projects and shrink the window for judicial review. Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware — a key Democrat in negotiations as chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee — told Kelsey that some of those asks are “a bridge or two too far.”

Still, he added, “we’re going to keep talking.”

For their part, Democrats are eager to streamline the build-out of long-range interstate power lines that carry solar and wind power from rural areas to city centers (a move that could embolden federal regulators over state planners, which Republicans say they oppose).

Some Democrats are increasingly willing to trade perks for oil and gas to get transmission language in law in the short time before Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the White House.

This week, President-elect Donald Trump pledged to essentially dispose of any environmental review process for anyone investing a billion dollars or more into energy infrastructure projects.

“GET READY TO ROCK!!!” he said in a Truth Social post.

Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman of California, who has long been against changes to NEPA, told Kelsey he’s “a lot more open this year than I am heading into next year.”

“I think next year, a lot of this is going to be force-fed [to] us,” he said.

But they have little time to come to an agreement. And key players have expressed doubt that the negotiations will result in a deal by the end of the year.

House Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) said talks are not ready to be elevated to the congressional leadership level at this point. And House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) said a deal would require “real permitting reform beyond what we’ve seen so far.”

“It’s very doubtful we do anything in the end of the year,” said West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, the top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee.

 

It's Wednesday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@eenews.net.

 

A message from Centrus Energy:

The United States lacks a large-scale, U.S.-owned uranium enrichment capability to fuel our nuclear reactors. In fact, almost 100% of global enrichment capacity now belongs to foreign, state-owned enterprises. Congress set aside $3.4 billion to jumpstart U.S. nuclear fuel production, but now we face a choice: spend U.S. tax dollars importing centrifuges manufactured overseas -- or support energy independence by investing in American technology, manufactured here at home by American workers. Learn more.

 
Play audio

Listen to today’s POLITICO Energy podcast

Today in POLITICO Energy’s podcast: Alex Guillén breaks down a case before the Supreme Court that could limit how much federal agencies can consider the climate impacts of new infrastructure projects.

 

A message from Centrus Energy:

Advertisement Image

 
Power Centers

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) speaks at a rally.

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), shown speaking at a rally in January, has been tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to lead EPA. | Matt Rourke/AP

Lee Zeldin, according to his former colleagues
Former New York Republican congressman Lee Zeldin, Trump's pick to lead EPA, is an ambitious, workhorse politician ready to tackle a complex regulatory agency like EPA, his former colleagues and subordinates say.

Kevin Bogardus and Timothy Cama interviewed 15 people who served with Zeldin on Capitol Hill or worked for him in Congress and on the campaign trail.

SCOTUS weighs agencies' climate authority
The Supreme Court on Tuesday was sharply critical of a push by oil industry allies for a bright-line rule on how federal regulators should conduct environmental analyses for projects like oil wells, highways and hydroelectric dams, write Niina H. Farah and Lesley Clark.

The justices appeared ready to defer to agencies' decisions on the scope of their NEPA analyses, said Kevin Minoli, a partner at the firm Alston & Bird who previously worked for EPA.

EU approves new sanctions on Russian ‘shadow fleet’
The European Union will blacklist dozens of oil and gas tankers helping Moscow earn billions from illicit fossil fuel sales, write Gabriel Gavin, Victor Jack and Koen Verhelst.

It’s the EU's 15th sanctions package targeting Russia since it invaded Ukraine nearly three years ago. The new penalties will bar an additional 52 tankers from EU ports, raising the total to 79 in a bid to rein in Russia’s “shadow fleet,” a group of aging ships trading sanctioned fuel behind murky ownership structures.

In Other News

Massages and country clubs: Your electric bill may be funding lavish perks.

ESG investing: How to decide whether sustainable investing is right for you.

Exploring new tactics: As teenagers, they protested Trump’s climate policy. Now what?

 

Billions in spending. Critical foreign aid. Immigration reform. The final weeks of 2024 could bring major policy changes. Inside Congress provides daily insights into how Congressional leaders are navigating these high-stakes issues. Subscribe today.

 
 
Subscriber Zone

A showcase of some of our best subscriber content.

An Exxon logo is pictured at a gasoline station.

An Exxon logo is pictured at a gasoline station. | Bruce Bennett/AFP via Getty Images

A bitterly divided federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a record $14.25 million Clean Air Act penalty levied against Exxon Mobil — but only after 18 months of infighting among 17 judges failed to yield a majority opinion.

Biden officials are shelving one major option they considered to counter China’s market control of critical minerals: offering competitors a limited financial lifeline.

The Biden administration is urging the Supreme Court to reject bids from oil and gas companies that want to quash a flood of lawsuits seeking to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for the effects of climate change.

That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.

 

Write your own chapter in the new Washington. From the Lame Duck Congress Series to New Administration insights, POLITICO Pro delivers intelligence across 22+ policy areas to help you anticipate and navigate change. Discover how a Pro subscription empowers you. Learn more today.

 
 
 

A message from Centrus Energy:

The lack of an American-owned uranium enrichment capability represents a glaring hole in our energy security and national security supply chain. That’s why bipartisan leaders in Congress set aside $3.4 billion to jumpstart American nuclear fuel production.

But how – and WHERE – that money gets spent is crucial. If the solution is simply to import foreign-technology centrifuges that are exclusively manufactured overseas, the United States will have missed a critical opportunity to create American jobs and reclaim our technical leadership. Centrus Energy is proud to be the only enrichment company that manufactures centrifuges in the United States. A large-scale deployment would catalyze thousands of U.S. jobs– and keep U.S. tax dollars in the United States.

It's time to invest in American technology, built by American workers. Learn more.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Arianna Skibell @ariannaskibell

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

No comments:

Post a Comment

Surprise! MVP revives Smart Money

Competition is heating up in the Philippine e-wallet space ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌     ͏ ...