Tuesday, August 6, 2024

DEI fight reignites

A newsletter from POLITICO for leaders building a sustainable future.
Aug 06, 2024 View in browser
 
The Long Game header

By Jordan Wolman

With help from James Bikales

THE BIG IDEA

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump walks on stage at the National Association of Black Journalists, NABJ, convention, Wednesday, July 31, 2024, in Chicago. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump put the "DEI" debate on center stage. | Charles Rex Arbogast/AP Photo

DEI DRUMBEAT — Companies that publicly embraced diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the aftermath of the 2020 murder of George Floyd have begun reframing those efforts in the wake of a conservative backlash that has made DEI a dirty word.

That backlash has reached the presidential campaign trail, with some Republicans aiming to paint Vice President Kamala Harris as a “DEI hire” by President Joe Biden — and former President Donald Trump pouring gasoline on that fire by questioning Harris’ racial identity.

The conservative political attacks on the “S” part of the environmental, social and governance triad have forced companies to reckon with their own policies — some legitimately scaling back corporate commitments, and many others shifting their messaging to sharpen the business case.

“There is a broader, difficult cultural and political moment around corporate DEI, and you’re seeing lots of companies trying to de-escalate the tensions surrounding DEI programs, reassessing their commitments and statements, and trying to sort of steer clear of certain classifications or terminology that could be viewed as stereotypes or controversial,” said Andrew Jones, senior researcher at The Conference Board, a global nonprofit think tank.

Morris DeFeo, partner and chair of Herrick Feinstein’s corporate department, said momentum swings for and against DEI programs have been subject to shifts in public perception. Seismic events like the killing of Floyd and the Supreme Court’s decision to end affirmative action in higher education have contributed to the broader business mood.

“You’re going to see a pendulum back and forth, with people taking advantage of the politicization of the topic during an election season,” he said.

A few major companies have reportedly shrunk their DEI initiatives, which can include recruitment and retention of diverse workers, boosting pay equity, and supporting external groups. Google and Meta have cut efforts. John Deere said it would no longer sponsor “social or cultural awareness” events. And Microsoft also caught heat for allegedly retreating, though a company spokesperson disputed that account in an email exchange with your host.

Overall, two-thirds of business executives consider the current environment surrounding corporate diversity efforts to be “very or extremely challenging,” according to a recent Conference Board survey.

“Clearly, the political environment has evolved,” Jones said. “A lot of DEI commitments were made four years ago in the aftermath of the murder of George Floyd. Many of those were three- to five-year commitments, so perhaps now was a natural time to reevaluate and readjust those.”

Corporate shareholders have on average supported fewer diversity-related proposals in recent years — in line with other ESG topics.

Meredith Benton, a workplace equity program manager who consults for the shareholder advocacy nonprofit As You Sow, said that while the pressure is affecting how companies are balancing their stakeholders on DEI issues, “it doesn't change an economic rationale for having strong workplace equity programs.”

“We are definitely hearing a shift in language,” she said. “The way that DEI is being framed in conservative circles — it’s actually a meritocracy that they are calling for. We are beginning to use that word more actively. Diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in the workplace are intended to create a meritocratic system. We are leaning into that more heavily.”

AROUND THE NATION

PLASTICS FIGHT — The Biden administration is facing fire from green groups over its decision to conditionally approve a loan for a major plastics recycling facility to be located in a low-income neighborhood in Erie, Pennsylvania, your host reports.

The new conflict is the latest in a series of fights that President Joe Biden has had to deal with as he seeks to deploy Inflation Reduction Act funds to stimulate domestic manufacturing while also fulfilling his administration’s commitment to protect already overburdened communities from the impacts of further pollution.

The Energy Department conditionally approved $182.6 million for International Recycling Group to build a massive facility to recycle plastic bottles and jugs. IRG also plans to send a portion of the plastic waste it receives to be combusted to make steel at an unannounced facility in another disadvantaged community in northwest Indiana, replacing coal in the process.

The fight centers on Pennsylvania's Erie County a purple patch in a critical swing state as November’s election looms.

Democrats have been looking to tout the IRA’s benefits to voters largely unaware of the legislation, and critics of the Erie project say it will undermine that effort.

“This will not help build confidence in the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act,” said Judith Enck, a former EPA regional administrator who leads the advocacy group Beyond Plastics.

But Jigar Shah, director of DOE’s Loan Programs Office, said the project is a “win-win” because it will create jobs, address the plastic pollution crisis and offset coal usage in the steel industry.

Not everyone in the local community is opposed: Gary Horton, president and CEO of Erie’s NAACP chapter and a member of Gov. Josh Shapiro’s advisory board for environmental justice, backs the project, as does Erie Mayor Joe Schember.

CARBON MARKETS

NO CREDIT FOR YOU — The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, which has embarked on a process to raise standards for carbon credits, issued its first round of rejections for credit methodologies applying to use the group’s high-quality label.

The group denied eight renewable energy methodologies, meaning that 236 million unretired credits won’t be able to use the group’s Core Carbon Principles label. That’s one-third of the entire voluntary carbon market.

“It’s significant because it shows that we do want to push the market toward the robust assessment framework,” ICVCM CEO Amy Merrill said in an interview. “And if things don’t pass it, they don’t pass it.”

ICVCM’s rejections highlight concerns around carbon crediting methodologies in the wake of a series of scandals tied to programs alleging false or exaggerated benefits.


While the long-term goal is clear, what happens immediately is less so: Some companies inevitably own the credits that the ICVCM just deemed to be inadequate and likely are using those credits toward net-zero goals. Merrill said “what they do now is a business decision for” those companies as the market undergoes a “systemic change” in project design and credit methodologies.


We reported last week that another body of technical experts, the Science-Based Targets initiative, said in a report that allowing companies to buy offsets to shrink their carbon footprints presents “clear risks.” Democrats in Congress are urging federal regulators to crack down on deception in the voluntary carbon market in response to the ongoing questions about its legitimacy.

Merrill said to expect more assessment decisions to come throughout the remainder of the year.

Movers and Shakers

SEA CHANGE — Leticia Reis de Carvalho, a Brazilian oceanographer and U.N. Environment Programme official, won an overwhelming election victory to become the next head of the international body that is working toward regulations to govern deep-sea mining.

Carvalho unseated two-term incumbent Michael Lodge in a 79-34 vote to become the first woman to serve as secretary-general of the International Seabed Authority.

The move comes at a critical time as countries aim to finish regulations to greenlight seabed mining next year amid concerns about the potential environmental harms — and after Lodge faced allegations of financial mismanagement and pro-industry bias. A coalition of 10 watchdog groups called for an independent investigation into allegations of corruption at the ISA, Hannah Northey and Clare Fieseler reported for POLITICO’s E&E News.

Carvalho told us earlier this year that she wants to elevate scientific research and bring a greater deal of “neutrality” to the organization. Stakeholders across the spectrum appeared to welcome the election results.

Andrew Thaler, CEO of the environmental consulting firm Blackbeard Biologic who has consulted on deep-sea mining issues for 15 years, said the margin of Carvalho’s victory was “really surprising” and amounted to a “substantial rebuke” of Lodge’s leadership.

“She strikes me as someone who is as much more aggressive as a regulator,” Thaler said in an interview. “And so if the industry reaches commercialization, if the mining code gets approved, I think we can expect a secretariat that is more aggressive in its duties towards ensuring that the regulations are being followed.”

The Metals Company, a firm that is considering filing the first ever deep-sea mining application this year, is similarly optimistic. TMC Chair and CEO Gerard Barron said he thinks the “decisive victory” means that the ISA membership “wants change, and change was delivered.”

“I’m confident that [Carvalho] has the talents to bring it together and to get these regulations finalized,” Barron said.

The U.S. couldn’t vote since it hasn’t ratified the Convention on the Law of the Sea, a requirement to be a full ISA member. A State Department spokesperson said the U.S. didn’t take a position on the candidates but congratulated Carvalho on her election.

 

During unprecedented times, POLITICO Pro Analysis gives you the insights you need to focus your policy strategy. Live briefings, policy trackers, and and people intelligence secures your seat at the table. Learn more.

 
 
YOU TELL US

GAME ON — Welcome to the Long Game, where we tell you about the latest on efforts to shape our future. Join us every Tuesday as we keep you in the loop on the world of sustainability.

Team Sustainability is editor Greg Mott and reporters Jordan Wolman and Allison Prang. Reach us all at gmott@politico.com, jwolman@politico.com and aprang@politico.com.

Sign up for the Long Game. It's free!

 

SUBSCRIBE TO GLOBAL PLAYBOOK: Don’t miss out on POLITICO’s Global Playbook, our newsletter taking you inside pivotal discussions at the most influential gatherings in the world. Suzanne Lynch delivers the world's elite and influential moments directly to you. Stay in the global loop. SUBSCRIBE NOW.

 
 
WHAT WE'RE CLICKING

— West Virginia is reaping benefits from the Inflation Reduction Act, but that hasn’t helped the political fortunes of Sen. Joe Manchin. Kelsey Brugger of POLITICO’s E&E News has that story.

— The U.S. is seeing a sort of climate migration in reverse as more Americans move to areas prone to flood and wildfire risk, the Washington Post reports.

Should the U.S. send Great Lakes water west as climate conditions imperil the nation’s food supply? A New York Times guest essay addresses that question.

 

Follow us on Twitter

Debra Kahn @debra_kahn

Greg Mott @gwmott

Jordan Wolman @jordanwolman

Allison Prang @AllisonPrang

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

No comments:

Post a Comment

This is why traders fail, Trader

Human emotions make trading and investing difficult. Do you know what I'm talking about? ...