Editor's note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. PROGRAMMING NOTE: We'll be off next week for the holidays but back to our normal schedule on Tuesday, Jan. 3. Sam Bankman-Fried is reportedly telling his Bahamian jailers that he's giving up his extradition fight and will "face the music" on wire fraud, money laundering and campaign finance charges in the U.S. Politicians whose campaigns were flooded with FTX cash are starting to reckon with what that tune might sound like. "Politicians really don't like giving money back. They really don't," Mick Mulvaney, a former congressman and White House chief of staff to President Donald Trump, told MM. U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Damian Williams instructed political groups last week to cooperate in the potential recovery of "tens of millions of dollars" that Bankman-Fried and others obtained to allegedly "buy bipartisan influence and impact the direction of public policy in Washington." The Democratic National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee have started to set aside amounts that equal Bankman-Fried's contributions until they receive further instruction. Some lawmakers have already begun to cut checks to charitable organizations in amounts equal to what they received from Bankman-Fried, FTX executive Ryan Salame — who spent $24 million on GOP races in the midterms — and other FTX-linked groups. (Political giving was hardly the only prong in FTX's influence strategy — Laura Wagner at Defector was unsparing in her analysis of how SBF-backed media companies now face similar dilemmas.) But while the clawback of FTX's $70 million-plus in political spending would cause chaos in fundraising circles — NYT's Ken Vogel and Ken Bensinger reported that House Majority PAC, which received $6 million from SBF, had less than $500,000 on hand as of last month — it's also created an unusual dynamic as crypto policy debates heat up. Both parties got flooded with FTX cash. So — for now anyway — few in Congress are making that big a deal out of it. "I don't remember anybody making that big a deal out of the political contributions that SBF made" in last week's congressional hearings on the collapse, said Mulvaney — who now advises the crypto compliance company Astra Protocol on its U.S. strategy. "I know it's an issue. It's been discussed in the press — I get all that — but I don't remember it being a central feature of those hearings, which is probably a good sign [for crypto policy] because it doesn't mean it's overly politicized yet." Of course, just because FTX's political giving wasn't a major factor in last week's hearings doesn't mean it won't be moving forward. Rep. Brad Sherman of California, a key Democrat on House Financial Services, has fired several broadsides aimed at Bankman-Fried's influence campaign. Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) — a leading crypto skeptic on the Hill who's working on his own crypto bill — has also raised red flags about the industry's attempts to sway regulation. Just as importantly, Williams last week said that SDNY's investigation into FTX remains active. "This investigation is very much ongoing, and it is moving very quickly," he said. IT'S MONDAY — Happy Hanukkah! A certain MM host's wonderful in-laws drove down from The Bronx to drop off (delicious) latkes and brisket on Sunday night. How do you dress your latke? Please send tips to ssutton@politico.com and zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment