Tuesday, May 3, 2022

📉 Check your formula

Plus: T-note milestone | Tuesday, May 03, 2022
 
Axios Open in app View in browser
 
Presented By Let Everyone Invest
 
Axios Markets
By Matt Phillips and Emily Peck · May 03, 2022

🌮🌮 Happy taco Tuesday, friends. Later this week, Fed chair Jerome Powell will be talking and markets will be listening, read on to get situated before it all happens.

📆 Join Axios fintech reporters Ryan Lawler and Lucinda Shen today at 12:30pm ET for a virtual event focused on the future of crypto adoption. Register.

Today's newsletter, edited by Kate Marino, is 1,050 words, 4 minutes.

 
 
1 big thing: Why stock valuations are diving
Data: FactSet; Chart: Axios Visuals

A swift shift in investor enthusiasm, rather than a weakening in corporate profit power, is driving the market's recent flop. Blame Powell. Or Putin. Or both, Matt writes.

The big picture: The stock market is on track for the worst year since 2008, falling nearly 13% so far in 2022, lopping roughly $5 trillion off the value of the S&P 500 and threatening to turn a sour national mood downright poisonous.

What's happening: Price-to-earnings ratios — a closely watched measure of how investors are valuing stocks — have tumbled sharply over the last month (though they remain above 2019 levels).

State of play: After an initial collapse in the early weeks of the COVID crisis, valuations jumped to 24 in September 2020, a level of market excitement — verging on mania — that we hadn't seen since the dot-com boom of the late 1990s.

  • That surge was set off, in part, by the Federal Reserve's remarkable moves to cut rates and start injecting money into financial markets to counteract the economic impact of the pandemic.
  • But since March, multiples have plunged even as expectations for earnings over the next year have gone up a bit. So, what gives?

A stock slump doesn't always mean that people expect companies or the economy to struggle. It can just reflect a sudden shift in the flows of money. That's sort of what we're seeing now.

How it works: Investors who try to value companies based on the profits those companies make are essentially relying on the logic of formulas called discounted cash flow models.

  • While there are many different variations, they all basically work the same way. The idea is you plug in a few key variables about a company into these formulas, which spit out a guess about what a company is worth.

The intrigue: Long-term interest rates — essentially we're talking about the yield on the 10-year Treasury note — are a crucial ingredient in these formulas.

  • This is simplified, but the key thing to know is that in these formulas — all else equal — when long-term interest rates rise, the current value of the investment falls. Long-term interest rates are determined in large part by the Fed.

Long-term rates have been surging in recent weeks, as energy costs shot sharply higher — the result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine — and Fed officials felt the need to say they'd hike rates faster than previously expected.

  • The result? An almost mechanical downdraft in stock prices, even if there's no proof yet that the economic picture is getting much worse.

The bottom line: The stock market wasn't the economy on the way up, and it isn't on the way down, either.

Go deeper.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
2. 🧗🏽‍♀️ T-note yield briefly climbs above 3%
Data: FactSet; Chart: Axios Visuals

The yield on the 10-year Treasury note — arguably the most closely watched number in financial markets — hit 3% briefly yesterday, a milestone it's rarely crossed since 2011, Matt writes.

Why it matters: As we explained above, the surge in Treasury yields is a big reason the stock market has been miserable lately.

  • The yield on the 10-year Treasury — known as the T-note — is a key determinant of borrowing costs for everything from corporate bonds to mortgages.

State of play: The recent push higher for T-note yields — less than six months ago it was below 1.50% — reflects increasing conviction in the bond market that the Federal Reserve is going to move quickly to crush inflation with much higher interest rates.

What's next: On Wednesday, the Fed will announce its next rate move, which most analysts think will be a half-percent hike.

  • But the path of both bonds and stocks will hang on how Fed chair Jerome Powell conducts himself in the post-announcement press conference — a must-see-TV event for markets geeks.
Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
3. Catch up quick

📉 European stocks endure flash crash after mistaken Citigroup sell order. (Reuters)

🛢 BP takes a $25.5 billion accounting charge from exit in Russia. (WSJ)

⚠️ SEC adds staff to regulate crypto markets. (CNBC)

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from Let Everyone Invest

Regulators could take away your investment choices
 
 

Under FINRA's potential regulations, if your investments are deemed "complex" you might be required to:

  • Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge.
  • Go through "cooling off" periods where you can't invest.

Help us stop them.

 
 
4. Kashkari on the 2% inflation target
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari. Photo: Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari. Photo: Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

 

The Fed begins its two-day policy meeting today — and tomorrow afternoon it will very likely raise its interest rate target as it attempts to cool demand that's contributing to once-in-a-generation inflation.

  • Axios' Neil Irwin spoke with Neel Kashkari, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, over the phone on April 21, about whether Fed policymakers are truly determined to bring inflation down to their 2% target or would declare victory with somewhat higher inflation.

"As far as I'm concerned, our mandate is still 2%, and we want to get back down to 2%," Kashkari said. "And if in the future, a future committee wants to deliberate and change that mandate, they can do so."

  • "But until that happens, I think we're all committed to achieving the goals that we have agreed upon, and that's 2% inflation, recognizing it's not going to happen quickly.
  • It could take a number of years before we get back. But I don't think just drifting down to something above our 2% target and declaring victory...helps maintain our credibility."

Read more

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
HQ
Share Axios and earn rewards
If you like this newsletter, your friends may, too! Refer your friends and get free Axios swag when they sign up.
 
5. The rich get poorer
Data: Realtime Inequality; Chart: Baidi Wang/Axios

If your income is rising much more slowly than inflation, that's a sign you might be rich, Axios' Felix Salmon writes.

Why it matters: The bottom 90% of earners are seeing their income keep up with inflation, while the bottom 50% had wage gains 3.4% bigger than inflation in the first quarter of 2021. That's according to Realtime Inequality, a project that attempts to disaggregate growth statistics by income percentile.

By the numbers: Real income for the bottom 50% rose by a stunning 11.7% in 2021. The top 1% did even better, seeing their incomes rise by 12.7% last year — thanks in large part to soaring markets.

  • In the first quarter of 2022, wage gains for the bottom half continued — but a sluggish market meant that rich folks' income growth turned negative.

What they're saying: "Growth was strong for the working class," concludes Berkeley economist Gabriel Zucman, a c0-founder of the website.

  • First-quarter economic growth was negative, which implies that some group of Americans had to bear the brunt. In this case, it was the rich. "All the decline in GDP is concentrated in the top 10%" of the income distribution, says Zucman.

The bottom line: Wage inflation is good for workers and bad for the rentier classes.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from Let Everyone Invest

Everyone should be able to make their own investment choices
 
 

Regulators are considering limiting your right to invest and make your own financial decisions.

If you agree that certain investments shouldn't be limited to the wealthiest, tell them you oppose restrictions on your investments.

Submit your official comment.

 
HQ
Like this email style and format?
It's called Smart Brevity®. Over 200 orgs use it — in a tool called Axios HQ — to drive productivity with clearer workplace communications.
 

Axios thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters. If you're interested in advertising, learn more here.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Axios, 3100 Clarendon B‌lvd, Suite 1300, Arlington VA 22201
 
You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Axios.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here.
 
Was this email forwarded to you?
Sign up now to get Axios in your inbox.
 

Follow Axios on social media:

Axios on Facebook Axios on Twitter Axios on Instagram
 
 
                                             

No comments:

Post a Comment

Most important medical advance in 100 years

Artificial Intelligence is being harnessed to create breakthrough drugs no one has ever seen before. ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ...