WELCOME TO THE THANKSGIVING WEEK version of Weekly Tax, where we hope everyone is staying safe out there. That show's old enough to be a grandfather! Today marks 57 years since the premiere of the BBC show "Doctor Who," which seems to have worked in part because 13 separate people have played the aforementioned Doctor Who. We'll take your whats, whens, wheres and whys, too. Email: alorenzo@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com, teckert@politico.com and bbecker@politico.com. You can also reach us on Twitter at @aaronelorenzo, @berniebecker3, @tobyeckert, @brian_faler, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax. BACK TO PPP: Here's an industry take on how Treasury and the IRS are handling the situation — maybe now's not the time to be so by the book. "There is no textbook for a pandemic economy with three different waves of government closure orders, capacity restrictions and a contagious virus that affects on-premise behavior," said Aaron Frazier of the National Restaurant Association. "So when we hear that, academically, this policy may hold water, it doesn't feel like it applies to the real world situation that small businesses are facing right now." Frazier, like other business advocates, believes that the executive branch could fall in line behind what legislative leaders say they were trying to do in March's CARES Act, H.R. 748 (116). Still, he acknowledged that the best option would be for Congress to weigh in further. The practitioner side: The plan for lots of companies taking PPP loans was pretty simple — take your ordinary and necessary business deductions this year, and then hope that the powers that be change their mind so you can get your loan forgiven in the future. But last week's newest statement from Treasury and the IRS seemed laser-focused on shutting down that idea. The government warned companies that think their PPP loan might be forgiven to hurry up and apply, because businesses won't be allowed the tax deductions if they "reasonably believe" the loans will be excused. So one more idea: Would some companies take the chance that a Biden administration might reverse Mnuchin on this? Glen Birnbaum, a partner at the accounting firm Sikich based in East Peoria, Ill., said he'd advise against that path. Birnbaum noted that he'll be explaining to clients that a revenue ruling is "pretty high up on the food chain," and doubted many taxpayers or preparers will want to risk running afoul of it. "I think it will cause more to file for an extension in the hopes that this will get cleared up via Congress," he added. THE WEEK AHEAD: Ron Klain, the incoming White House chief of staff, said on ABC's "This Week" that Biden would start announcing Cabinet picks on Tuesday. The president-elect has already said that he's decided on his Treasury secretary, so stay tuned come tomorrow. (Janet Yellen? Lael Brainard?) Which leads into: The status of IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. To be clear, neither Biden nor his team have left any indication that they're unhappy with the commissioner, whose term runs deep into 2022, even though there is plenty of frustration among progressives over how Rettig has handled Democrats' request for President Donald Trump's tax returns. At a Friday hearing with Rettig, Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee, kind of just let it drop that this could be the IRS chief's last hearing in that role, before adding that he wasn't trying to suggest anything. But others are certainly trying to suggest something: The Revolving Door Project, in a memo they're sending around today, put both Rettig and Mike Desmond, the IRS chief counsel, on a list of officials chosen by Trump that Biden should fire immediately. (The rationale: "No political appointee in the Trump administration can be reasonably assumed to put country over party.") One thing to remember: It's been pretty common for presidents to dawdle on nominating new IRS commissioners, and for the Senate to take its time on confirming them — which means it's also been typical for past commissioners to finish their five-year terms and then be succeeded for months at a time by a deputy who isn't a political appointee, while the administration and Congress work to get a nominated replacement in place. Jeff Hauser of the Revolving Door Project said that's one reason to think that getting rid of Rettig or Desmond wouldn't be that disruptive. |
No comments:
Post a Comment