STOPGAP TALKS HEAD INTO WEEKEND One week out from the Dec. 20 government shutdown deadline, top lawmakers are still working through disagreements over funding and policies getting added onto the funding patch they’re trying to finalize. Leaders hope to release bill text of the stopgap spending measure over the weekend. But they’re currently locked in a battle over what to do about farm aid and conservation funding, according to two people familiar with the negotiations. "It's a big f—g mess," said one Hill aide, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the negotiations. What Republicans want: $16 billion in aid for farmers hit by natural disasters and $12 billion for farmers who've experienced market losses in recent years. GOP leaders don’t want: To incorporate the $14 billion for conservation programs that Democrats passed under the Inflation Reduction Act into the farm bill budget each year. Democrats and Republicans have been fighting over whether to keep the strict climate parameters around the money. And Democrats say GOP leaders can’t have one without the other. Other additions: The list of possible bills that could hitch a ride on the stopgap is coming into focus as well with the shutdown deadline approaching. That includes a package to authorize a slew of expiring health care programs, bipartisan permitting reform and a measure to restrict U.S investments in China. — Meredith Lee Hill and Jennifer Scholtes THE NEXT PHASE OF THE ETHICS FIGHT? House Republicans are quietly discussing potential repercussions against Ethics Committee ranking member Susan Wild (D-Pa.), including a possible censure resolution, after she reportedly shared panel information. But it’s less clear that House Republicans will ultimately move forward with any formal punishments — especially with less than a week of session left before they leave until January. One House Republican, who was granted anonymity to discuss the matter and confirmed talks about a potential censure resolution or other repercussions, summed it up this way when we asked if anything would actually happen given the schedule: “Two yards and a lot of dust.” Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) said in a statement that he was not leading a censure resolution effort against his fellow Pennsylvanian, but “there must be consequences for ‘leaking.’” “How can anyone have any faith in the House Ethics Committee when one of its very Members are engaged in unethical practices,” he added. The talk of potential punishments comes after The Hill reported on Monday that, according to two sources, Wild had acknowledged to the panel that she had leaked information. Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that he believed there should be “repercussions” for leaking. “Rep. Wild was frustrated by the manner in which the report was handled and didn't feel it was fruitful to participate in any further meetings on its ‘potential’ release. Characterizing it as anything more is inaccurate. There will be no further statement,” Jed Ober, Wild’s chief of staff, said in a statement referring to Wild’s absence from a recent Ethics panel meeting. — Jordain Carney and Nicholas Wu
|
No comments:
Post a Comment