FDIC Chair Marty Gruenberg may be on his way out, but he’s sprinting full speed ahead to the finish line when it comes to banking policy. Gruenberg, who agreed to resign pending the confirmation of a successor in the wake of a toxic workplace scandal, is likely to stay on the job a bit longer than some might have expected. The Senate will head into its summer recess without even a committee vote on the nomination of Christy Goldsmith Romero, President Joe Biden’s pick for a new FDIC leader. (The calendar for September is tight before lawmakers again skip town for the month of October to campaign). In the meantime, though, Gruenberg intends to charge forward with major policy changes, if the packed agenda for today’s FDIC board meeting is any indication. Here’s our look at what to expect: Asset managers beware: Republicans and Democrats on the FDIC board for months have been exploring ways to more closely scrutinize index fund giants like BlackRock and Vanguard that own significant stakes in U.S. banks. But in April the board split over exactly how to do that, tabling a pair of proposals. Now it appears the board is closing in on a bipartisan agreement to toughen the framework the agency uses to analyze the influence that asset managers may have on the banks in which they invest — and whether they’re meeting their promises to remain “passive” investors. More from your MM host here. Under the tentative deal, which is set to be discussed at today’s meeting, the FDIC would renegotiate those passivity agreements with asset managers and take a more hands-on approach to the investment companies by moving away from self-certification. The FDIC board is also expected to take up a broader regulatory proposal by CFPB Director Rohit Chopra that would give the agency more power to stop investors from taking a large stake in banks or their parent companies. Eye on brokered deposits: The FDIC is also expected to vote on a rollback of Trump-era changes to how the regulator defines brokered deposits, funds that a third party directs to a bank. The 2020 changes narrowed the scope of companies that are considered deposit brokers in an effort to make it easier for banks to partner with outside firms. Gruenberg, who voted against those changes, and other Democrats, argue that they created loopholes for how regulators treat a riskier class of deposits. Travis Hill, the Republican vice chair, meanwhile, preemptively warned against reopening those changes in a speech last week. Also on the agenda: The board will vote on a proposal by Gruenberg to revise another set of rules, the FDIC adopted during the previous agenda: policies governing how the regulator approaches industrial banks. In addition, the board plans to vote on finalizing guidance on how some large banks, though not the biggest institutions, must submit their wind-down plans. IT’S TUESDAY — Get in touch at mstratford@politico.com. As always, send tips and suggestions to Sam at ssutton@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment