PRESSING AHEAD: The Biden administration’s full-speed effort to finalize a battery of rules before summer arrives is rankling some folks who are being left in the dust. The White House’s Office of Management and Budget wrapped up its review of a pair of Labor Department rules, one that would expand overtime pay guarantees and another raising professional obligations on certain forms of retirement investment advice. However, at least two parties who booked meetings with the administration to discuss the latter issue say that OMB abruptly canceled on them and left them in the dark. “We haven’t heard much — it’s mostly inferring from the cancellation of the meeting that we won’t have a chance to provide our thoughts,” said John Grady, the president-elect of the Alternative & Direct Investment Securities Association. “More work could and should be done to calculate the impact of this rule.” “OMB has shown a disregard for input from the public,” attorney Kent Mason of the firm Davis & Harman LLP, whose clients include several financial institutions opposed to the rule, told POLITICO in an email after his meeting was canceled. “We knew that OMB was rubber stamping the final rule. So, what this has done is publicly confirm that.” The administration held 18 meetings on the fiduciary proposal and nearly that many on the OT language. OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs notes that it “may finish review of a regulatory action before a scheduled meeting. In that case, OIRA may need to cancel the meeting.” "This is not unusual,” an OMB spokesperson told POLITICO. Still OIRA’s language also pledges to “make every effort to notify requesters as soon as possible if a meeting needs to be canceled,” something the rule’s critics say did not happen in this instance. Plus, it arguably runs counter to the spirit of the administration’s effort to increase participation in the regulatory process and make it easier to schedule these sorts of meetings. Republicans in Washington are closely tracking the administration’s handling of the fiduciary rule in particular, with House Education and the Workforce Chair Virginia Foxx saying it “gives rise to serious questions as to whether the agency has extended due consideration to stakeholder input,” in a statement last week. However, the real risk of such process complaints comes when a policy is being challenged in court, where the specter of the “arbitrary and capricious” test, the Administrative Procedure Act, and other federal constraints have tripped up several other Biden labor policies. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, April 15. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Work-from-home is apparently disrupting entrepreneurs in the home-burglary space. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and lukenye@politico.com. Follow us on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye. PROGRAMMING NOTE: Friday was Grace's last day as an intern on the labor team. But she’ll be sticking around the newsroom as a food and agriculture reporter. Send her ag-related tips and keep in touch at @YarrowGrace on X and gyarrow@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment