President-elect Joe Biden will face constraints of both politics and time when it comes to pursuing his aggressive climate-change agenda. Driving the news: Biden will enter a White House after four years of President Trump rolling back climate policies when time is running out to substantively address the problem. Where it stands: The highest profile parts of Biden's agenda, and the ones that will be quickest out of the gate on Inauguration Day, will be initiatives to reverse Trump's rollbacks on a host of fronts across the environmental and energy spaces. Between the lines: Trump's rollbacks aren't actually the biggest impact of his presidency — it's lost time. - This temporal hiatus is essential to understanding how Biden is caught between urgency and politics.
- "The impact of the Trump administration on emissions has been significant, but the actual regulatory rollbacks were only part of it," says Trevor Houser, partner at the consulting and research firm Rhodium Group.
- "The bigger impact was four years of lost federal policy action."
The big picture: Climate change is cumulative. The longer we wait, the harder it gets to solve. Trump's presidency has coincided with rising alarm and evidence of a warming planet, but the world has been methodically cooking itself for decades. "We've had 30 years of inadequate response to climate change, and the last four have been dramatic because there was actually an intention to not respond as opposed to just an inability to respond." — Jason Grumet, president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a centrist think tank How it works: Biden has 2035 and 2050 goals to reduce U.S. emissions, which are in line with scientific consensus but are also going to be herculean political tasks to begin solving (let alone achieve). The intrigue: One relatively ambitious policy that some Washington insiders believe is possible is a clean energy standard for electricity, which would help achieve Biden's 2035 carbon-free power goal. - A bipartisan version exists in the House, and Republicans in both chambers have increasingly acknowledged the government should do something about climate change.
But, but, but: Such a substantive debate on climate policy is unlikely to occur out of the gate of a Biden presidency given the twin health and economic crises. Some experts say that would be a wise move. - "I don't think we want the biggest climate battles to happen in the next six to 18 months," Grumet says.
- "We're more likely to be successful once we are through the trauma and fear of the public health and economic crises."
Read more |
No comments:
Post a Comment