The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has advice for the National Institutes of Health on advancing women's health research — an underfunded and understudied area of study. The NIH-backed report, released today and compiled by the Committee on Assessment of NIH Research on Women’s Health, examined the agency’s funding for women’s health research, program structures, policies and research priorities. "The NIH is underspending on women's health research, which is leading to an underinvestment in filling significant gaps in knowledge about women's health," Alina Salganicoff, committee co-chair and director of the Women’s Health Policy Program at KFF, a health policy think tank, said Thursday. Still, she added: "Increasing funding alone is not enough to make significant progress in women's health, and the current structure of the NIH limits its ability to address the women's health research gap." The report’s recommendations include: — Urge Congress to elevate the Office of Research on Women’s Health to an NIH institute, with a budget of at least $4 billion over its first five years — Appropriate $11.4 billion in congressional funding over five years for interdisciplinary women’s health research — Encourage the NIH director and institute and center directors to prioritize women’s health research and set annual benchmarks for its funding. — Develop a more transparent and data-driven process for setting women’s health research priorities — Promote female investigators and develop new grant programs for projects related to women’s health — Prioritize basic research, including animal studies, as well as clinical population-level research aimed at understanding female-specific health conditions Why it matters: Women have long been underrepresented in all forms of biomedical research, from basic research to population-level studies. Even lab rats are overwhelmingly male. That means many drugs and treatments aren’t developed with women in mind, and some are less effective and safe for women. Women are also more likely to be misdiagnosed or go undiagnosed. Yes, but: It’s unclear whether women’s health is among Republicans’ top health priorities in the next Congress. Instead, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the NIH; Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s HHS secretary choice for nominee; and Republicans in House and Senate health leadership positions have indicated they’re keen to reform the NIH. Notably, the House NIH reform proposal seeks to shrink the agency, not add institutes. The proposal, which Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), an appropriator who oversees the agency’s funding, is shepherding, suggests consolidating the NIH’s 27 institutes and centers into 15. |
No comments:
Post a Comment