Monday, November 25, 2024

The Trump picks who want to reform health care

Delivered daily by 10 a.m., Pulse examines the latest news in health care politics and policy.
Nov 25, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Pulse Newsletter Header

By Chelsea Cirruzzo and Ben Leonard

Driving The Day

President-elect Donald Trump arrives at a meeting at the Hyatt Regency

President-elect Donald Trump has announced a slate of health agency nominees who share skepticism of some federal public health measures and aim to overhaul regulatory agencies. | Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

THE MAHA DEPARTMENT TAKES SHAPE — The potential nominees to run federal agencies during the second Trump administration are aligned on their mission to overhaul some health regulatory agencies, reshape how doctors are paid and shift focus from infectious diseases to chronic diseases.

President-elect Donald Trump on Friday night announced three additional key health nominations: former Florida Rep. Dave Weldon to lead the CDC, Fox News contributor Dr. Janette Nesheiwat to be surgeon general and surgeon Marty Makary to lead the FDA. They join the nominees for HHS secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and CMS administrator, Dr. Mehmet Oz.

While all those the nominees except Kennedy have medical backgrounds, none have led federal agencies and all share some level of skepticism for federal Covid-19 guidance and public health. Those views range from Weldon’s and Kennedy’s debunked claims tying vaccines to autism and Nesheiwat’s criticism of government mandates and recommendations that young, healthy people receive Covid vaccines.

But respected members in the health care sector aren’t running for the hills yet.

On Sunday, Dr. Ashish Jha, the Covid-19 response coordinator in the Biden administration, posted on X that Makary and Oz are “pretty reasonable.”

“I have plenty of policy disagreements with them. They are smart and experienced,” wrote Jha, who did not respond to requests for further comment.

Their plans: Trump’s picks have identified pieces of their agendas — including some areas of possible bipartisan agreement.

That includes potentially changing how doctors are paid, as first reported by STAT. And Kennedy’s hope to pull corporate interests out of regulation is aligned with progressive groups — though they still oppose him because of his penchant for anti-vaccine rhetoric.

Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, noted the shift in focus from infectious diseases — which the Biden administration has capitalized on with the pandemic and avian flu — to chronic diseases.

“I think the real issue is that they have the right diagnosis but the wrong solution,” Benjamin said.

The concerns: Public health experts and a former acting CDC director who spoke with Pulse said the incoming administration’s health care goals, such as taking a critical look at regulatory systems and focusing on preventive care, might not be unpopular, but achieving them could be at odds with both Republican and Democrats.

And many Trump health picks have had harsh words for federal health agencies, promising to cut staff or offices.

It’s okay to take a critical look at health care systems, said former acting CDC Director Rich Besser, who now heads the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, “but coming in with the perspective that ‘these systems are all broken’ could lead to the loss of a lot of talent in these government agencies.”

Even within the administration’s nominees, there could be tensions: Kennedy has called for overhauling the food system to address what he believes are drivers of chronic disease, but Trump’s choice to lead the USDA, Brooke Rollins, seemingly has a more tempered approach.

What we don’t know: The Trump transition team hasn’t filled all the open agency positions at HHS, which means the full picture hasn’t panned out yet on policy priorities.

“The question is who will be at the next tier down,” Dr. Peter Hotez, a vaccine scientist and critic of the first Trump administration, who also said Neisheiwat was a good choice for surgeon general on X on Friday night, told Pulse.

WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE. Today’s newsletter is powered by the “Wicked” (2024) soundtrack. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to ccirruzzo@politico.com and bleonard@politico.com and follow along @ChelseaCirruzzo and @_BenLeonard_.

PROGRAMMING NOTE: We’ll be off for Thanksgiving this Thursday and Friday but back to our normal schedule on Monday, Dec. 2.

 

Want to know what's really happening with Congress's make-or-break spending fights? Get daily insider analysis of Hill negotiations, funding deadlines, and breaking developments—free in your inbox with Inside Congress. Subscribe now.

 
 
In Congress

Rep. Michelle Steel speaks at a hearing.

Advocates across the health care sector are pushing Congress to pass a bill introduced by California Rep. Michelle Steel to permanently make telehealth more accessible. | Michael A. McCoy/Getty Images

TELEHEALTH UNCERTAINTY — Eased rules for telehealth access under high-deductible health plans are set to expire at the end of the year, and it’s unclear whether Congress will extend them, Ben reports.

Legislation from Rep. Michelle Steel (R-Calif.) making the rules permanent would have a significant price tag — $5 billion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Other priorities, like Medicare telehealth rules and community health center funding, might take precedence in a health package negotiation. And key Democrats have been skeptical, arguing the GOP has used the plans to undermine the Affordable Care Act.

Pandemic rules allowed high-deductible health plans to cover telehealth for patients before they reach their deductibles to help curb the virus’ spread. They expired at the end of December after Congress extended them for two years at the end of 2022.

The case for the legislation: Advocates are making their closing argument, with more than 225 organizations, which include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Rural Hospital Association, the National Association of Manufacturers and insurer lobby AHIP joining a push for Congress to extend the rules. They frame the issue as one that could hurt consumers’ pocketbooks — some patients received unexpected bills when the rules temporarily lapsed in early 2022.

“Without congressional action, employers will be required to charge employees more to access telehealth services, creating a barrier to care,” the group wrote in a letter to Congressional leadership Thursday.

BERNIE’S WORLD — Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Friday he plans to remain on the Senate HELP Committee as its ranking member — though a spokesperson for Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said no official committee assignments have been made yet.

Sanders would be swapping places on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee with current ranking member Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who will become chair, POLITICO’s Sophie Gardner reports.

“In the next Congress, I look forward to serving as the Ranking Member on HELP and continuing to fight for a health care system that guarantees that every American can see a doctor, an education system that is affordable to all, and a country in which all seniors can retire with dignity,” Sanders said Friday in a statement.

Why it matters: As chair, Sanders targeted health care costs, getting the CEO of Novo Nordisk to testify before the committee about the pricing for Ozempic and Wegovy, its popular diabetes and weight-loss drugs.

What’s next: In addition to remaining on Senate HELP, Sanders noted that he will serve on the Finance Committee, where he also plans to focus on health care issues.

SENATORS TARGET CYBERSECURITY — New bipartisan legislation to protect against cyberattacks in the health care sector would give grants to health care entities to improve their security against hackers.

The bill, by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), is a softer approach than another bill co-sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Warner to mandate that hospitals adopt cybersecurity standards.

Why it matters: Health care data breaches have risen sharply in recent years. Ransomware attacks, where cybercriminals hold records or entire health care systems hostage until they’re paid, have risen 264 percent over the past five years, according to HHS Office for Civil Rights.

HHS has said it plans to introduce mandates for hospitals in the coming years — though that remains to be seen with the incoming administration — and is opposed by hospitals who say it will be costly and already have their own standards.

The senators’ bill would:

Provide training to health entities on cyber best practices, with particular support for rural communities

Require HHS to develop a cybersecurity incident and response plan

Improve coordination between HHS and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

What’s next? The bill is unlikely to move before the end of the year but might be a framework for the next Congress.

WHAT WE'RE READING

The Washington Post reports on companies offering menopause health benefits.

NPR reports on the investments Dr. Mehmet Oz, tapped to lead CMS, made in health care businesses.

 

Don't just read headlines—guide your organization's next move. POLITICO Pro's comprehensive Data Analysis tracks power shifts in Congress, ballot measures, and committee turnovers, giving you the deep context behind every policy decision. Learn more about what POLITICO Pro can do for you.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Dan Goldberg @dancgoldberg

Chelsea Cirruzzo @chelseacirruzzo

Lauren Gardner @Gardner_LM

Sophie Gardner @sophie_gardnerj

Kelly Hooper @kelhoops

Robert King @rking_19

Ben Leonard @_BenLeonard_

David Lim @davidalim

Megan Messerly @meganmesserly

Alice Miranda Ollstein @aliceollstein

Carmen Paun @carmenpaun

Daniel Payne @_daniel_payne

Ruth Reader @RuthReader

Erin Schumaker @erinlschumaker

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

No comments:

Post a Comment

Discover the next Magnificent 7 Stocks—FREE

Fellow Inves...