THE BUZZ: HEAVYWEIGHTS — After spending much of the legislative session maneuvering in the background, some of Silicon Valley’s biggest players are speaking up about AI. Meta on Tuesday picked apart the Legislature's marquee effort to regulate the technology, telling Gov. Gavin Newsom's staff and key lawmakers in a letter that the proposal "fundamentally misunderstands" artificial intelligence — marking the first time the company has spoken out about AI regulation on the state level. Senate Bill 1047 from Scott Wiener, which requires large AI models to undergo safety tests, would effectively make developers liable for scenarios they aren’t equipped to prevent, wrote Rob Sherman, Meta vice president and deputy chief privacy officer for policy. That risk, he argued, would discourage companies from keeping their technology open-sourced and could narrow the market to a handful of models — effectively keeping out the little guys, a similar argument to the one made by Y Combinator. “Startups and small businesses are critical to the California economy, and SB 1047 would undermine their ability to compete and succeed in the AI marketplace,” the letter said. Companies like Meta and Google for months have kept close tabs on the guardrails proposed by Wiener and others, but until recently they’ve mostly allowed trade groups like TechNet and the Chamber of Progress to do the talking. That’s changed in recent weeks as Wiener’s bill continues to roll through the Legislature with little resistance. The coalition against it, meanwhile, has grown increasingly concerned about its impact on a lucrative sector of the tech industry. Efforts to stir up fears around the existential risk to tech don’t seem to be resonating with legislators, but they could land differently with Newsom. The governor has long touted California’s leadership in regulating social media and holding tech companies accountable — like the landmark Consumer Privacy Act and Age-Appropriate Design Code — but has seemed hesitant to wrap red tape around artificial intelligence. “If we over-regulate, if we overindulge, if we chase the shiny object, we could put ourselves in a perilous position,” he said at a San Francisco summit last month. He hit the same tone in his State of the State address on Tuesday, where he touted California as the home to what may be the most fertile startup ecosystem “in economic history” and compared the advent of artificial intelligence to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, has repeatedly insisted he doesn’t want to hamper innovation. He has characterized the bill — which aims to prevent frightening scenarios like nuclear or biological weapons attacks — as creating reasonable protections for the public good. In a statement Tuesday, he emphasized that the bill doesn’t cover startups and that the state attorney general would enforce the law in limited and extreme circumstances. Wiener added that while he’s grateful for feedback from many sectors of the tech industry, some of the proposal’s critics are opposed to any form of AI regulation. “While I respect that perspective,” he said, “... I do take issue with the significant misinformation being spread about the bill, including the false and absurd claim that model developers will go to prison for releasing a model that causes harm.” (That claim was made by Y Combinator critics). The tech industry, meanwhile, is applying increasing pressure on Sacramento to pump the brakes. Google’s head of AI and emerging tech policy, Alice Friend, also sent a letter this month to assemblymembers and the Newsom administration, saying Wiener’s bill would inadvertently undercut innovation without substantially addressing known risks and harms. SB 1047 is set to be heard next week in the Assembly Judiciary Committee, which is led by Ash Kalra, one of the Legislature’s most progressive members. It then heads to the Appropriations Committee, chaired by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks — a longtime Wiener ally. GOOD MORNING. Happy Wednesday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as “CA Playbook” in your contacts. Or drop us a line at lkorte@politico.com and dgardiner@politico.com, or on X — @DustinGardiner and @Lara_Korte. WHERE’S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. |
No comments:
Post a Comment