Tuesday, May 14, 2024

A Q&A with Citi’s Brent McIntosh

Presented by the American Bankers Association: Delivered daily by 8 a.m., Morning Money examines the latest news in finance politics and policy.
May 14, 2024 View in browser
 
POLITICO Morning Money

By Zachary Warmbrodt

Presented by 

the American Bankers Association

Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.

QUICK FIX

Just how upbeat is Wall Street about the U.S. economic outlook?

Brent McIntosh, Citigroup’s chief legal officer and former Trump Treasury undersecretary for international affairs came away from discussions at last week’s Milken conference with a sense of “remarkable” optimism about what’s ahead for the U.S.

“Last year, it felt like people were just trying to figure out what’s going on,” he told MM. “There was a huge amount of uncertainty. … This feels like a 180 from that.”

A message from the American Bankers Association:

Americans appreciate free checking and other low-cost financial products that help bring more consumers into the regulated banking system. Today, the progress we’ve made in reducing the number of unbanked is at risk, because the Fed wants to change the rules around debit card transactions and limit the revenue banks use to offer free checking and other popular products. Tell the Fed to stand with consumers and withdraw Regulation II. Act now.

 

What’s driving the good vibes, and what else is top of mind for one of the banking industry’s top executives? MM has a few excerpts from our chat on the sidelines of Milken, edited for length and clarity.

What’s behind the optimism? How much of it is U.S. structural advantages? How much of it is policy?

It’s structural [in the] U.S., and it’s seeing the signal in the U.S. economy despite the headwinds. Who would think that it could be that strong at a time when we have two shooting wars going on around the world and the inflationary environment we're in? And yet there does seem to be a lot of enthusiasm for the U.S. economy right now.

I think people are looking at broader causes of this than government policy. I don't hear people talking about the Biden administration as a cause of this or U.S. government policy — or, frankly, government policy in other countries as the cause of this.

[MM sidebar for further reading: The U.S. is expected to grow faster this year than any of its G7 peers, and foreign investors expect that comparative strength to persist.]

Why isn't Biden getting credit? 

This is a group that feels some frustration at the regulatory environment. There’s an accumulation of rules being promulgated, which don’t feel like they’ve been coordinated with each other. They often don’t feel fully formed. Some of them feel politically motivated.

How are things looking outside the U.S.?

There's a really desynchronized economic situation right now.

We talked about the U.S. and the strength here. Europe is in a very different place. Persistent inflation. You have Germany suffering from weak manufacturing growth. You do have Spain and Greece and some parts of southern Europe with real tourism strength. But the economy in Europe is just not going the way the U.S. economy is going.

China, it feels like they've hit the bottom of the cycle. There's still some amount of weakness in the real estate sector there, but it's probably manageable.

And then you have India, which we talked about last year as a great positive spot, and we continue to believe that. A government devoted to fiscal discipline. They seem to have a better inflationary environment than some places around the world. Investment-led growth. So we're pretty bullish on India.

You really have a sense that, and I think it shows up in the data, foreign direct investment into China has dried up. So, to the extent people want exposure to China, they want it through U.S. and other non-Chinese companies, which is a development that I think has been crystal clear talking to people at the conference.

One thing that has been interesting is Argentina, with President [Javier] Milei here. It does feel like they have the right policy prescriptions to solve their problems. It’s tough love, but they feel the way they need to feel to get it done.

For the Milken crowd, what’s at stake in the U.S. election?

You hear two things in people analyzing the election.

One is, what effect will it have on geopolitics and especially trade relations and the relationship with China?

People perceive that the Trump administration would be tougher on China than the Biden administration has been and more inclined to impose tariffs. So people are paying attention to that. That creates both risks and opportunities for global financiers.

The second thing they’re paying attention to is, what does the election do for the regulatory environment in the United States? The pace and prudence of some of the regulations that have been imposed over the course of the past three years, you hear people criticizing that. There certainly is a sense it may be a more measured regulatory environment if the White House changed hands.

But could it come down to administration nominees and staffing?

You hear a lot of talk about the question of personnel. You hear a lot of people arguing against the conventional wisdom and saying that there are some really good people poised to serve in a Trump administration.

It’s Tuesday — Send tips to zwarmbrodt@politico.com.

 

THE GOLD STANDARD OF FINANCIAL SERVICES POLICY REPORTING & INTELLIGENCE: POLITICO has more than 500 journalists delivering unrivaled reporting and illuminating the policy and regulatory landscape for those who need to know what’s next. Throughout the election and the legislative and regulatory pushes that will follow, POLITICO Pro is indispensable to those who need to make informed decisions fast. The Pro platform dives deeper into critical and quickly evolving sectors and industries, like financial services, equipping policymakers and those who shape legislation and regulation with essential news and intelligence from the world’s best politics and policy journalists.

Our newsroom is deeper, more experienced, and better sourced than any other. Our financial services reporting team—including Zach Warmbrodt, Victoria Guida and Declan Harty—is embedded with the market-moving legislative committees and agencies in Washington and across states, delivering unparalleled coverage of financial policy and the financial services industry. We bring subscribers inside the conversations that determine policy outcomes and the future of industries, providing insight that cannot be found anywhere else. Get the premier news and policy intelligence service, SUBSCRIBE TO POLITICO PRO TODAY.

 
 
Driving the day

The Producer Price Index for April is out at 8:30 a.m. … Fed Governor Lisa Cook gives a speech on community development financial institutions in New York at 9:10 a.m. … PCAOB investor advocate Saba Qamar and U.K. Shareholders’ Association Chair Charles Henderson speak at a Peterson Institute event on auditing at 9 a.m. … Fed Chair Jerome Powell has a moderated discussion with De Nederlandsche Bank President Klaas Knot in Amsterdam at 10 a.m. …

Biden reveals China tariffs — The Biden administration is announcing today that will raise tariffs on electric vehicles, clean energy technologies, computer chips and metals imported from China, following a years-long review.

In related news, the Washington Post reports that President Joe Biden is blocking a Chinese-backed crypto mining firm from owning land near a Wyoming nuclear missile base because of national security concerns.

Yellen on Gruenberg — Per Michael Stratford, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen expressed concern Monday over the FDIC internal review released last week that found pervasive harassment and a toxic workplace at the agency.

“The kind of abuses that were documented in the report are a totally unacceptable way to treat employees at the FDIC, and not in line with the core values of the Biden administration,” Yellen told reporters during a gaggle in Fredericksburg, Virginia.

She sidestepped the question of whether FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg ought to resign, as congressional Republicans and at least one Democrat are urging him to do. Gruenberg is scheduled to face lawmakers Wednesday and Thursday at House and Senate hearings.

In lighter Yellen news, Michael reports that the world-renowned foodie stopped for a hot dog at the Mason-Dixie Cafe and ordered a chocolate custard at Carl’s Frozen Custard.

Fudge’s new gig — POLITICO Influence reports that former HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge is joining the law firm Taft Stettinius & Hollister, a little more than a month after leaving the Biden administration. She’s bringing along former staffers Imani Edwards and Garrett McDaniel.

Mark Cuban’s messaging advice for Biden — In an X post, the billionaire Biden ally highlighted a chart showing the rise of individuals investing in the stock market since the pandemic.

“A sign of widespread confidence in the economy,” he wrote. “If only this administration could market itself worth a damn.”

Where they want bigger banks — In a Bloomberg interview, French President Emmanuel Macron said he would be open to a major French bank being taken over by an EU rival to spur deeper financial integration. France is home to many of the euro area’s biggest banks, including BNP Paribas.

 

JOIN 5/22 FOR A TALK ON THE FUTURE OF TAXATION: With Trump-era tax breaks set to expire in 2025, whoever wins control of Congress, and the White House will have the ability to revamp the tax code and with it reshape the landscape for business and social policy. Join POLITICO on May 22 for an exploration of what is at stake in the November elections with our panel dissecting the ways presidential candidates and congressional leaders are proposing to reshape our tax rates and incentives. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
On the Hill

A Senate crypto vote — Eleanor Mueller reports that the Senate is eyeing a Wednesday vote on House-passed legislation that would overturn SEC guidance that critics say discourages banks from holding digital assets. The White House has threatened to veto the legislation.

Separately, the House is gearing up to vote this week on three bills that would have the Commerce Department take action on blockchain technology, including encouraging its use to monitor supply chains and directing the Commerce secretary to advise the president on it.

Regulatory Corner

Investment advisers balk at dirty money crackdown — Jasper Goodman reports that the SEC and Treasury’s FinCEN are proposing a rule that would require investment advisers to comply with new anti-money laundering standards. SEC Chair Gary Gensler said the plan “could reduce the risk of terrorists and other criminals accessing U.S. financial markets to launder money, finance terrorism, or move funds for other illicit purposes.”

The industry is pushing back. Gail Bernstein, general counsel of the Investment Adviser Association, said in a statement that the group is concerned that the proposal will capture "virtually all SEC advisers" and "will not accomplish the stated policy goals because it lacks sufficient tailoring to the unique business models and risk profiles of SEC advisers."

 

A message from the American Bankers Association:

Advertisement Image

 
Fly Around

People moves Rachel Glennerster will be the next president of the Center for Global Development in September … Courtney Robinson, previously of Block and the staff of House Financial Services, is joining Akoya as head of policy and communications

A message from the American Bankers Association:

The Federal Reserve’s Regulation II proposal to lower the cap on debit card interchange is a mistake we need to avoid. The proposal will pad the profits of mega-retailers at the expense of everyday Americans. All you need to do is look at history to know what’s coming. More than 10 years after the Durbin Amendment was enacted, Fed studies show consumers have yet to benefit from the lower prices that retailers promised. Instead, merchants pocketed the savings from the government-mandated price cap, while community banks lost a key revenue source that they used to cover the cost of debit rewards and other popular products. The new Fed price cap proposal threatens to do even more damage to consumers by slashing revenue banks use to pay for free checking and other services that promote financial inclusion. Tell the Fed to stand with consumers and withdraw Regulation II. Act now.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Mark McQuillan @mcqdc

Zachary Warmbrodt @Zachary

Victoria Guida @vtg2

Declan Harty @ @declanharty

Eleanor Mueller @eleanor_mueller

Katy O'Donnell @katyodonnell_

Sam Sutton @samjsutton

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://login.politico.com/?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

No comments:

Post a Comment

If you’re doing this - beware.

...