A BIG BIBI BREAK — As the public pressure mounts over the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Senate Majority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER took to the Senate floor this morning to deliver an unusually sharp rebuke of the Israeli government and call for the ousting of its leader, PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU. Schumer, the highest ranking Jewish political leader in American history, condemned Netanyahu as having “lost his way” amid Israel’s battle with Hamas, stating “the Netanyahu coalition no longer fits the needs” of Israel:“I believe a new election is the only way to allow for a healthy and open decision-making process about the future of Israel.” “The world has changed radically since [Oct. 7] and the Israeli people are being stifled right now by a governing vision that is stuck in the past,” Schumer continued. “Nobody expects Prime Minister Netanyahu to do the things that must be done to break the cycle of violence, preserve Israel’s credibility on the world stage, and work towards a two-state solution.” It’s hard to overstate how momentous such statements are coming from Schumer, who has hugged Israel tight throughout a five-decade political career cradled in heavily Jewish neighborhoods of Brooklyn. But the rising public anger over the Gaza war — and Netanyahu’s embrace of a far-right coalition — has pushed those ties to the breaking point. To be sure: Schumer didn’t only blame Netanyahu for the woeful state of affairs in the Middle East. He also fingered Hamas, “radical” right-wing Israelis and Palestinian Authority President MAHMOUD ABBAS as “four obstacles to peace,” noting that Abbas “must step down and be replaced by a new generation of Palestinian leaders who will work towards attaining peace with a Jewish State.” Still, Schumer’s criticism marks a genuine milestone in a decade of steadily worsening relations between Netanyahu’s governments and Washington Democrats — and it creates space for others in the party to openly criticize the longtime PM. (Whether that eventually includes President JOE BIDEN remains to be seen.) The responses erupted in short order: On the Hill … Schumer’s comments “won quick kudos from progressives, with Sen. BRIAN SCHATZ (D-Hawaii) lauding it on social media as ‘gutsy, historic.’ Sen. PETER WELCH (D-Vt.) walked up and gave Schumer a hug after the leader wrapped up his remarks,” Anthony Adragna reports. Across the aisle, Minority Leader MITCH McCONNELL immediately lambasted the speech in his own floor remarks, calling it “grotesque and hypocritical for Americans who hyperventilate about interference in our own democracy" to call for Netanyahu’s removal: "Make no mistake: The Democratic Party doesn't have an anti-Bibi problem. It has an anti-Israel problem." At the Greenbrier … Gathered at their annual retreat in West Virginia, House GOP leadership organized an impromptu news conference to respond to Schumer, CNN’s Melanie Zanona reports. House Speaker MIKE JOHNSON described the remarks as “inappropriate,” while Majority Leader STEVE SCALISE called them “disturbing” and “disgraceful.” From the Netanyahu government … Israel’s ambassador to Washington, MICHAEL HERZOG, criticized Schumer's comments in a post on X: “It is unhelpful, all the more so as Israel is at war against the genocidal terror organization Hamas, to comment on the domestic political scene of a democratic ally. It is counterproductive to our common goals.” And the West Wing … In a call with reporters the afternoon, White House National Security Adviser JOHN KIRBY avoided weighing in, stating: "We know that Leader Schumer feels strongly about this. So, we’ll certainly let him speak to it and to his comments.” The Biden administration, he added, is “laser focused on trying to get a temporary ceasefire in place so that we can get the hostages out and get more aid." Latest on the ground … “State Department imposes new sanctions on Israeli settlers over West Bank violence,” by NYT’s Michael Crowley WATCH THIS SPACE — Indicted Sen. BOB MENENDEZ (D-N.J.) is now eyeing whether to seek re-election as an independent, NBC News’ Julie Tsirkin, Carol Lee and Kate Santaliz report. The rationale all comes down to self-preservation, they explain: To raise funds that could pay his legal bills, Menendez needs to remain a candidate. Were he to seek a fourth term as a Democrat, “he would need to come up with 1,000 signatures by March 25th — so time is not on his side. But running as an independent would give him more time; in that case, he would only need 800 signatures by June 4th to qualify for the ballot.” Good Thursday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Drop me a line at birvine@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment