For House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry’s crypto bills, there is yet another bump in the road: House conservatives floating a vote on a central bank digital currency alongside other digital asset legislation. The issue picked up momentum last month when the Heritage Foundation’s political arm announced it would grade members on their support for a bill from Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) that would block the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC to consumers, either directly or through banks, out of concerns over privacy. "We do not want to emulate the Chinese Communist Party, who are using central bank digital currency — the digital yuan — to literally surveil their population," Emmer told the American Bankers Association earlier this month. "It's outrageous." Now, half a dozen lawmakers, aides and lobbyists say House conservatives are discussing a vote on the legislation alongside McHenry’s flagship crypto bills, which would govern stablecoins and the broader crypto industry. One proposed plan? Move Emmer’s CBDC legislation to the House floor at the same time as one or both of the crypto bills, said one House Republican lawmaker granted anonymity to discuss closed-door conversations. The thinking is that without it, any Republican not on the House Financial Services Committee will shy away from voting “yes” on crypto out of concerns like those Heritage raised. “There’s a growing understanding that a CBDC will have to be addressed alongside any crypto bill,” said one industry executive granted anonymity to speak candidly. McHenry declined a request for comment. If the bills are combined, it would risk isolating the few Democrats who are supportive of McHenry’s other legislation. Not a single member of the minority voted to approve Emmer’s measure in September. “It’s ridiculous,” Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on House Financial Services’ crypto panel, said in an interview. With more than 130 countries exploring their own CBDCs, “sticking our head in the sand is not an option here.” Attaching language like Emmer’s could scare away moderate Democrats like Reps. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Jim Himes of Connecticut, Wiley Nickel of North Carolina, Brittany Pettersen of Colorado and Ritchie Torres of New York. And with a one-vote majority come April 19, Republicans need their help. “It just gives Democrats another excuse to walk away,” said a crypto lobbyist granted anonymity to speak candidly. In the meantime, the talks are more proof that a digital dollar is becoming a key issue for conservatives who see it as an "inherent threat to civil liberties," to use Heritage’s phrasing. Former President Donald Trump in January swore to block any Fed effort to develop a central bank digital currency. And Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in February introduced a Senate companion bill to Emmer’s. “Preventing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) continues to be a major area of focus for House Republicans,” Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.) said in a statement. “Members on both sides of the aisle are advancing this legislative objective and it remains a key part of our digital asset agenda.” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers earlier this month that the central bank would not issue a digital dollar without congressional approval. It’s Thursday — Send tips to zwarmbrodt@politico.com and follow Eleanor (@Eleanor_Mueller) and Jasper (@Jasper_Goodman).
|
No comments:
Post a Comment