A VERY SPECIAL ELECTION: Assemblymember David Weprin knows what it’s like to be under the klieg lights of a nationalized race. Weprin was the Democratic nominee in a 2011 special election to replace scandal-scarred Anthony Weiner in a Brooklyn House seat. He lost to Republican Bob Turner. But the loss taught Weprin a lot about how a special election, much like the one playing out on Tuesday between Democrat Tom Suozzi and Republican-backed candidate Mazi Pilip, is entirely different from a general election matchup. Weprin, who endorsed Suozzi, spoke with Playbook about this special election that has similarities to the race he waged and lost 13 years ago. The interview has been edited for length and clarity. What struck you the most about running in a special election? The traditional thought process doesn’t necessarily apply. There’s a lot of unknowns and unpredictabilities. You don’t really know what’s going to happen until it happens. Obviously, people aren’t used to voting in February. It’s going to come down to the weather that day. There’s an unusual amount of people who vote early now; that obviously was not a factor at all when I ran. It seems like this race has been, in effect, nationalized and turned into a referendum on the migrant crisis and Israel. Why does that happen? The 3rd district really does seem like this has become a national election as opposed to a local election. And my race became a national election as well because it was an important seat nationally. It was right after the surprise Kathy Hochul victory in Buffalo. She wasn’t expected to win. Back then, the issue was Barack Obama. His popularity was very low, and Israel was an important issue, too. Obama was perceived as not being pro-Israel enough. Netanyahu was the prime minister then, and he’s back now. It was a very Jewish district; it had a large Orthodox population. There are certain things you don’t anticipate that become a campaign issue. Was that frustrating having your race essentially become a referendum on Israel and Obama? I was supporting Obama, but I didn’t ask him to campaign for me in the district, just like Suozzi didn’t ask Biden to campaign for him. Presidential politics had nothing to do with my race. That was certainly a distraction. I didn’t think it was fair, but all’s fair in politics. People want to win an election, and this race on Long Island certainly has become a misleading referendum based on what outside groups are saying. If you look at these commercials, most are not from the candidates themselves. That’s more the nature of a special election. Is there added pressure being the only person on the ballot instead of running on a party-line ticket? There’s pressure, but it’s also added support. When I ran, it was the first time I had every Democratic official on my literature and campaigning for me. You rarely have that and the leaders of the party in both houses. I had them all. In the end, it came down to not endorsements, but other issues. I liked having all that support and everyone with me, but there were outside factors and other issues that had nothing to do with me or my opponent. — Nick Reisman HAPPY MONDAY: Got news? Send it our way: Jeff Coltin, Emily Ngo and Nick Reisman. WHERE’S KATHY? Making an economic development announcement in Herkimer. WHERE’S ERIC? Speaking at a Regional Technology Transfer Leadership Convening, meeting with the Staten Island Hurricanes youth football champions and hosting “Talk with Eric: A Community Conversation” at Murray Hill Academy. QUOTE OF THE DAY: “We could use Republican governors who have been complaining about the border problem to step up and say to members of their own party, ‘Give us the relief we've been asking for, help us out and pass that package.’ I’ve not heard that yet.” — Gov. Kathy Hochul on failed border deal in Congress on MSNBC
|
No comments:
Post a Comment