Thursday, August 3, 2023

The five pillars of Trump’s defense

Presented by The American Petroleum Institute (API): The unofficial guide to official Washington.
Aug 03, 2023 View in browser
 
POLITICO Playbook

By Ryan Lizza, Rachael Bade and Eugene Daniels

Presented by

The American Petroleum Institute (API)

With help from Eli Okun and Garrett Ross

Nadine Seiler protest as she holds a banner outside federal court Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023 in Washington. Former President Donald Trump has been charged by the Justice Department for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States government and witness tampering. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Former President Donald Trump is expected to plead not guilty today on federal charges. | AP

Play audio

Listen to today's Daily Briefing

DRIVING THE DAY

ARREST NUMBER THREE — Former President DONALD TRUMP is scheduled to appear in person at 4 p.m. at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington, where he will be arraigned on four criminal charges related to his efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election.

Bicycle barriers and other visible security measures appeared around the court overnight. Trump is expected to plead not guilty.

This morning, Kyle Cheney reports:

“[Special counsel JACK] SMITH has accused Trump of orchestrating a breathtakingly broad campaign to unravel American democracy and cling to power despite decisively losing the 2020 election. In service of that goal, Smith says, Trump deputized six co-conspirators — including attorneys RUDY GIULIANI, JOHN EASTMAN, SIDNEY POWELL and KENNETH CHESEBRO — to carry out a campaign of disinformation, cloaked in legal action, to convince state legislatures, Congress and then-Vice President MIKE PENCE to block President JOE BIDEN’s election. …

“The failure of that effort culminated in a burst of rage, with thousands of Trump’s faithful storming past police barricades and into the Capitol, while Trump — according to Smith — exploited the violence to continue salvaging his schemes.”

THE TRUMP DEFENSE TAKES SHAPE — In social media posts and interviews, both Trump and one of his main lawyers, JOHN LAURO, have now outlined how they will respond to the new Smith indictment.

In an interview with NPR, Lauro, a white-collar criminal defense attorney with over four decades of experience, detailed five pillars of his defense:

1. SLOW IT DOWN

While Smith said he will push for a speedy trial, Lauro is signaling the opposite. He is emphasizing the complexity of the case, which took three and a half years to put together, and the enormous amount of time it will take to interview witnesses and sift through the thousands of pages of documents the government will soon hand over.

“[W]hat we want is a just trial, not simply a speedy trial,” Lauro said. “There's no need to railroad any defendant in the United States. And we're hoping the Justice Department will recognize that justice is more important than speed.”

Related: “Prosecutors may be aiming for quick Trump trial by not naming alleged conspirators, experts say,” by AP’s Richard Lardner and Alan Suderman

2. PUT 2024 POLITICS FRONT AND CENTER

While Smith has avoided any discussion of the presidential election, Lauro, following Trump’s lead, wants U.S. District Court Judge TANYA CHUTKAN to take into consideration the fact that Trump is a candidate and likely GOP nominee.

“The Biden administration decided to bring an indictment against a political opponent in the middle of a campaign,” he told NPR. “And the thought of President Trump having to spend his time at trial instead of actively debating and talking about the issues against his political opponent is something that I think the judge is going to consider.”

There is no obvious precedent for Chutkan to lean on. As Josh Gerstein told Playbook last night, “What is a judge supposed to do when trying to balance the schedule of a front-running presidential candidate, at least in the primary, with the needs of the court to move forward with a criminal case?”

Related: “Trump Is Being Prosecuted, but Justice Department Is on Trial, Too,” by WSJ’s Sadie Gurman

3. ACCUSE SMITH OF “CRIMINALIZING SPEECH”

Lauro addressed the widespread skepticism that Trump has much of a First Amendment defense, arguing that “[w]hen you look at this indictment, it doesn't really say much other than President Trump was exercising his right to talk about the issues and advocate politically for his belief that the election was stolen and was improperly run. He got advice from counsel — very, very wise and learned counsel — on a variety of constitutional and legal issues. So, it's a very straightforward defense that he had every right to advocate for a position that he believed in and his supporters believed in.

“And this is the first time in the history of the United States where a sitting administration is criminalizing speech against a prior administration. It's really quite unprecedented and it really will politicize the criminal justice system, which is terrible to see. … And free speech encompasses political advocacy, which often involves acting on that free speech.”

Related: “Trump Election Charges Set Up Clash of Lies Versus Free Speech,” by NYT’s Michael Schmidt and Maggie Haberman

4. QUESTION TRUMP’S INTENT

Under the obstruction statute used to indict Trump, Smith must prove corrupt intent — that the former president knew the election was conducted fairly and so he executed a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results. The House Jan. 6 committee, with an eye on that law, long ago drilled down into every scrap of evidence they could find that showed Trump knew he lost the election and there was no outcome-determinative fraud. This evidence, with a few new details, is exhaustively laid out in the 45-page indictment.

(Another data point for the corrupt intent side of the ledger: Last night on CNN, Trump Attorney General BILL BARR told Kaitlan Collins that he also believed Trump knew this.)

Not so fast, insists Lauro: “What we will argue to the jury, and we'll win, is that President Trump was arguing for the truth to come out in that election cycle rather than the truth to be denied. Even at the end, when he asked Mike Pence to pause the voting, he asked that it be sent back to the states so that the states, in exercising their truth-seeking function, could either audit or recertify.”

Related: “Heart of the Trump Jan. 6 indictment: What’s in Trump’s head,” by WaPo’s Devlin Barrett and Josh Dawsey

A corollary to this is what Lauro has described as an advice of counsel defense, with Trump trying to prove there was no corrupt intent because he was simply relying on legal advice from lawyers such as Eastman. Smith has clearly anticipated this as five of the six co-conspirators described in the indictment are these same Trump lawyers, who Smith alleges were all in on it. More on this from WaPo’s Greg Sargent

Workers put up barricades outside the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Federal Courthouse, Wednesday, Aug. 2, 2023, in Washington. Former President Donald Trump is due in court on Thursday, the first step in a legal process that will play out in a courthouse between the White House he once controlled and the Capitol his supporters once stormed.

Workers put up barricades outside Washington's E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Federal Courthouse on Wednesday. | Alex Brandon/AP Photo

5. ATTACK D.C.

But the argument that Trump and his GOP allies are giving the most attention is that Washington is an inherently unfair venue for a trial.

Here’s how Trump put it last night on Truth Socal: “The latest Fake ‘case’ brought by Crooked Joe Biden & Deranged Jack Smith will hopefully be moved to an impartial Venue, such as the politically unbiased nearby State of West Virginia! IMPOSSIBLE to get a fair trial in Washington, D.C., which is over 95% anti-Trump, & for which I have called for a Federal TAKEOVER in order to bring our Capital back to Greatness. It is now a high crime embarrassment to our Nation and, indeed, the World. This Indictment is all about Election Interference!!!”

The “95%” number presumably derives from the 2020 election results in DC, which voted 92% to 4% for Biden over Trump. (West Virginia voted 69% to 30% for Trump over Biden.)

Hosts on Fox News and Republicans such as South Carolina Sen. LINDSEY GRAHAM and Florida Gov. RON DeSANTIS have been all over making a similar case about how no D.C. jury could ever be legitimate.

Lauro made a slightly more nuanced case yesterday. “We're looking for a more diverse area that has a more balanced political jury pool,” he told NPR. “You know, the country is very, very divided politically right now, this is a very divisive indictment. It goes to issues of free speech and political activity. So, we're looking for a jury that will be more balanced. And West Virginia was a state that was more evenly divided. And we're hoping for a jury that doesn't come with any implicit or explicit bias or prejudice. So it makes sense to go to a place like West Virginia.”

This might make for a good line at a debate in Iowa, but will Judge Chutkan go for it? Doubtful. Several Jan. 6 defendants tried in D.C. made similar requests for a change of venue and they were unsuccessful. (Chutkan herself handled several Jan. 6 cases, including one of Trump’s fights with the Jan. 6 committee.)

“I cannot see that argument flying with any judge in a federal court in D.C.,” Josh Gerstein tells us. “They've been presented with these arguments, similar arguments, in connection with the Jan. 6 cases … and they said essentially that they're not going to use political polling to determine whether a venue is appropriate for a criminal trial. Whether 90% or 60% of people in D.C. voted for Trump's opponent in 2020 or 2016 was not relevant to that analysis.”

Josh adds that judges did take more seriously arguments about the events of Jan. 6 having a more traumatic impact on Washingtonians. But that’s what voir dire is for.

“I think if you make a politically framed argument around poll numbers, it's going to get precisely nowhere in Trump's case,” Josh says. “So I don't think people should expect that to happen. And the other issue around the trauma of the event has generally just been dealt with by singling out and excusing individual jurors.”

Related: “Hoping to undermine the Trump indictment, his allies are targeting D.C.,” by WaPo’s Philip Bump

Good Thursday Morning. Thanks for reading Playbook. What’s Trump’s best defense? Drop us a line and tell us: Rachael Bade, Eugene Daniels, Ryan Lizza.

 

A message from The American Petroleum Institute (API):

Far-Reaching Impacts from EPA’s New Tailpipe Rule: A new and misguided EPA proposal would effectively impose a de-facto ban on gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles that account for nearly 99% of the cars and light/medium-duty trucks Americans drive, beginning in 2032. Instead, EPA should protect America’s access to affordable, reliable and efficient transportation. Rather than take choices away from Americans, EPA should focus on ways to reduce emissions in the vehicles most Americans own and prefer.

 

FOCUS ON THE FRINGE — “Could third-party candidates tip the scales in Trump’s favor, again?” by Holly Otterbein and Jonathan Lemire: “Though the president’s reelection team has preached confidence, some Democratic officials and strategists worry that the urgency to vote for Biden has dissipated for some voters since Trump left the White House. They are anxious that young people, in particular, might be receptive to [CORNEL] WEST’s message.”

THE PASSION OF CHRISTIE — CHRIS CHRISTIE is the guest on today’s episode of Kara Swisher’s twice-weekly interview podcast by N.Y. Mag, on which he reveals that he was questioned in one of the Trump investigations some weeks ago, though he said he couldn’t disclose which inquiry. “They were trying to get a handle on what I knew about his knowledge of the reality of the election results,” Christie said of the case he was questioned in.

On why other GOP candidates won’t call out Trump: “I think that some of them are unwilling to do it because they don't think it's politically smart, some of them are auditioning for a potential Trump administration, and I think some of them just aren't able to do it: they just physically aren't equipped to be able to be in that combat.” Listen to the full episode

FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Christie will be interviewed by CBS’ Robert Costa on the campaign, Trump and more for a segment on this week’s “CBS News Sunday Morning.”

 

A message from The American Petroleum Institute (API):

Did You Know? Here’s a dose of energy reality: Americans today drive nearly 272 million gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles, and these will account for more than 85% of the U.S. fleet in 2050. That’s where government rules to cut tailpipe emissions should be focused – not on limiting America’s vehicle choices.

 

BIDEN’S THURSDAY — The president has nothing on his public schedule.

VP KAMALA HARRIS’ THURSDAY (all times Eastern):

10:35 a.m.: The VP will depart D.C. en route to Milwaukee, Wis.

1:50 p.m.: Harris will receive a tour of the Sanmina Kenosha Facility with Commerce Secretary GINA RAIMONDO and Sen. TAMMY BALDWIN (D-Wis.). The group will deliver remarks.

5:20 p.m.: Harris will deliver remarks at a campaign reception.

6:25 p.m.: Harris will depart Milwaukee to return to D.C.

THE HOUSE and THE SENATE are out.

 

STOP SCROLLING (for just a minute!). Introducing a revamped California Playbook newsletter with an all-new team and a sharpened mission! Join Lara Korte and Dustin Gardiner as they take you on an extraordinary journey through California's political landscape. From inside the Capitol in Sacramento to the mayor’s office in Los Angeles, and from the tech hub of Silicon Valley to even further beyond, we're your front-row ticket to the action. Subscribe for access to exclusive news, buzzworthy scoops and never-before-revealed behind-the-scenes details straight from the heart of California's political arena. Don't miss out — SUBSCRIBE TODAY and stay in the know!

 
 

PHOTO OF THE DAY

People exit the Russell Senate Office Building, Wednesday, Aug. 2, 2023, in Washington. Authorities issued a shelter-in-place order and began searching Senate office buildings near the U.S. Capitol Wednesday afternoon amid reports of an active shooter.

People exit the Russell Senate Office Building on Wednesday after authorities issued a shelter-in-place order and began searching Senate office buildings amid reports of an active shooter. | Mariam Zuhaib/AP Photo

PLAYBOOK READS

2024 WATCH

STAFFING UP — The Biden campaign is beefing up its fundraising team, bringing on three DNC alums to help rake in the historic funds some Democrats think he and outside groups will need for his reelection bid in 2024, Holly Otterbein scoops. Biden is bringing on COLLEEN COFFEY and MICHAEL PRATT to serve as his campaign’s finance co-directors and JESSICA PORTER to be his grassroots fundraising director, rounding out a leadership group heading his finance operation amid a lean campaign overall. Coffey and Pratt are also alums of the 2020 campaign.

THE PENCE LITMUS TEST — Trump’s indictment has injected new life into the presidential race and “placed a sharper focus on Pence’s actions leading up to and on Jan. 6, including the revelation that he kept contemporaneous notes,” Adam Wren, Sally Goldenberg and Natalie Allison write. “It also elevated the idea that Pence himself would be a litmus test for the rest of the field: Would they have made a different decision that day? Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Pence showed no regrets or equivocations in the hours after Smith unveiled his indictment.”

THAT’S DEBATABLE — DeSantis last night agreed to take on California Gov. GAVIN NEWSOM in a debate moderated by Fox News’ SEAN HANNITY. “Absolutely, I’m game. Let’s get it done. Just tell me when and where,” DeSantis told Hannity. Newsom also sent a letter with the full outline for the debate rules, which he proposed as a 90-minute affair, taped live without the aid of notes or other documents on stage and held in either Nevada, Georgia or North Carolina — without a studio audience — on either Nov. 8 or 10. Read the full letterMore from Christopher Cadelago

THE ECONOMY

RATING RILE-UP — When Biden officials met with analysts at Fitch Ratings ahead of the organization’s recent release, they hoped that the aversion of a debt default earlier this year wouldn’t reflect negatively on the economy. Later, they received a draft report from Fitch, but it didn’t note how the final rating would fall. So when Monday’s report downgraded the U.S. credit rating for the first time in more than a decade, Biden aides were “shocked,” WaPo’s Jeff Stein reports, leaving senior officials like Treasury Secretary JANET YELLEN, NEC Director LAEL BRAINARD and CEA Chair JARED BERNSTEIN scrambling on Tuesday to coordinate a response, “which involved striking back at the ratings agency as soon as its analysis was released.”

Related reads: “U.S. Downgrade Sparks Selloff in Stocks and Bonds,” by WSJ’s Gunjan Banerji … “Fitch Downgrade Won’t Break Washington’s Tax, Spending Habits,” by WSJ’s Andrew Duehren

THE WHITE HOUSE

THE TIES THAT BIND — BARACK OBAMA told Biden in a private lunch meeting recently that he is concerned about Trump’s campaign strength, WaPo’s Tyler Pager reports, “including an intensely loyal following, a Trump-friendly conservative media ecosystem and a polarized country — underlining his worry that Trump could be a more formidable candidate than many Democrats realize.”

Obama then “promised to do all he could to help the president get reelected,” a pledge “at a time when Biden is eager to lock down promises of help from top Democrats, among whom Obama is easily the biggest star, for what is likely to be a hard-fought reelection race.”

NIGHT OF THE HUNTER — “Documents in failed Hunter Biden plea agreement made public,” by NBC’s Dareh Gregorian and Tom Winter: “The plea deal called for Biden to plead guilty to two counts of failing to pay his taxes in return for prosecutors recommending a sentence of probation. A separate gun charge for illegally owning a Colt Cobra .38 Special handgun would have been dropped in two years if Biden honored the terms of what's known as a diversion agreement.”

BACKSTORY — “Biden acknowledged his 7th grandchild after getting the ‘green light’ from his son,” by NBC’s Peter Nicholas, Carol Lee, Monica Alba and Mike Memoli

 

A message from The American Petroleum Institute (API):

Advertisement Image

Smart Regulation: Vehicle and fuel technologies can cut emissions while letting Americans choose their ride.

 

CONGRESS

SAD READ — “For an Ailing Feinstein, a Fight Over the Family Fortune,” by NYT’s Tim Arango and Shawn Hubler: “As DIANNE FEINSTEIN, 90, struggles to function in the Senate, a dispute within her family over control of her late husband’s estate is another difficult chapter at the end of a long career.”

LAWMAKERS, THEY’RE JUST LIKE US — “These 30 members of Congress are about to resume student-loan payments in October with millions of other federal borrowers,” by Insider’s Ayelet Sheffey and Bryan Metzger

POLICY CORNER

THE PERSISTENT PANDEMIC — “Amid Signs of a Covid Uptick, Researchers Brace for the ‘New Normal,’” by NYT’s Apoorva Mandavilli

HEADLINE SAYS IT ALL — “SALT Deduction Cap Vexes GOP After Vexing Democrats After Vexing GOP,” by WSJ’s Richard Rubin

AMERICA AND THE WORLD

FOR YOUR RADAR — “U.S. orders pull-out of many U.S. embassy personnel in Niger,” by Nahal Toosi, Lara Seligman and Alexander Ward

BEYOND THE BELTWAY

ON WISCONSIN — “Lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's legislative maps filed at the state Supreme Court,” by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Molly Beck

ABORTION FALLOUT — “Federal Appeals Court Further Limits Abortion Access on Guam,” by NYT’s David Chen

HAPPENING TODAY — “2 members of expelled ‘Tennessee Three’ vie to win back their legislative seats,” AP

TRUMP CARDS

OVERSERVED — “Special counsel asks if Nauta’s attorney has too many Mar-a-Lago clients,” by WaPo’s Perry Stein and Josh Dawsey: “In a court filing Wednesday, prosecutors said STANLEY WOODWARD — the lawyer for Trump valet WALTINE ‘WALT’ NAUTA — has represented at least seven other clients whom prosecutors have interviewed about Trump’s alleged efforts to keep classified documents in defiance of the government’s demand they be returned. Two of Woodward’s clients could be called as government witnesses in the trial, the filing said.”

IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING — “Fulton County sheriff says ‘we’ll have a mugshot’ if former Pres. Trump is indicted locally,” by WSB-TV’s Richard Elliot

 

HITTING YOUR INBOX AUGUST 14—CALIFORNIA CLIMATE: Climate change isn’t just about the weather. It's also about how we do business and create new policies, especially in California. So we have something cool for you: A brand-new California Climate newsletter. It's not just climate or science chat, it's your daily cheat sheet to understanding how the legislative landscape around climate change is shaking up industries across the Golden State. Cut through the jargon and get the latest developments in California as lawmakers and industry leaders adapt to the changing climate. Subscribe now to California Climate to keep up with the changes.

 
 
PLAYBOOKERS

Justin Trudeau and Sophie Grégoire Trudeau are separating.

Morgan Freeman visited the Pentagon yesterday.

Carla Hayden threw out the first pitch at the Nats game.

Donald Trump’s arraignment is pushing WaPo to pull out all the stops.

FOR YOUR RADAR — Anthony Anderson, Yvonne Orji and Nicole Byer will headline DC’s new “Because They’re Funny” comedy festival in October. The event will be produced by NICE CROWD, the folks behind the American Black Film Festival.

MEDIA MOVE — Coleen O’Lear as senior director of curation and platforms for Yahoo News. She most recently was head of curation and platforms at WaPo.

TRANSITIONS — Andrea Ducas is joining the Center for American Progress as VP of health policy. She most recently was senior program officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. … Oliver Kim is now senior director of public policy for Corewell Health’s government affairs team. He most recently was director of health policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center and currently is an adjunct professor of law with the University of Pittsburgh.

WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Lee Hudson, defense reporter at POLITICO, and Lawrence Gordin, senior contracts strategist at Palantir Technologies, welcomed Luke Hudson Gordin on Saturday. Pic

HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) (5-0) … Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) … U.S. Ambassador to Chile Bernadette Meehan … Kaiser Health News’ Rachana PradhanMatthew FoldiTom Qualtere … ABC’s Ben Siegel and John ParkinsonScott ParkinsonClaire Olszewski of the Obama Foundation … Jeff Dressler of SoftBank … Tom FreedmanMatt Compton … former Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) … Jordan BurkeErikka KnutiGraham MacGillivray Dmitri MehlhornJessica EnnisBrian Morgenstern … City Journal’s Brian Anderson … NYT’s Clarissa MatthewsJoe Ramallo of Sen. Bill Cassidy’s (R-La.) office … Jay Caruso … SKDK’s Rachael Shackelford … Reuters’ Brad Brooks … CNN’s Joe Ruiz Ken Nahigian DNC’s Emma Bailey … James Wegmann Jacob Weisberg of Pushkin Industries … Shaadi Ahmadzadeh Andrew Craft

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Send Playbookers tips to playbook@politico.com or text us at 202-556-3307. Playbook couldn’t happen without our editor Mike DeBonis, deputy editor Zack Stanton and producers Setota Hailemariam and Bethany Irvine.

 

A message from The American Petroleum Institute (API):

Freedom, Reliability, Security Threatened by EPA Tailpipe Proposal: The Biden administration’s proposed tailpipe emissions standards are bad news for Americans and the cars, trucks and vans they like to drive.
EPA’s proposal would effectively require 67% of new light-duty vehicles and 40% of medium-duty pickups and vans to be electric by 2032 – less than a decade away. The proposal would amount to a de-facto ban on vehicles that today make up about 99% of the U.S. fleet and 85% of the vehicles the government projects will be on the road in 2050.

The administration’s narrow focus on electric vehicles as the only way to reduce tailpipe emissions would impact Americans’ access to the cars, trucks and vans they count on every day for transportation. EPA should instead seek ways to tackle emissions from vehicles that account for today’s fleet – and protect America’s access to affordable, reliable and efficient transportation.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Rachael Bade @rachaelmbade

Eugene Daniels @EugeneDaniels2

Ryan Lizza @RyanLizza

 

Subscribe to the POLITICO Playbook family

Playbook  |  Playbook PM  |  California Playbook  |  Florida Playbook  |  Illinois Playbook  |  Massachusetts Playbook  |  New Jersey Playbook  |  New York Playbook  |  Ottawa Playbook  |  Brussels Playbook  |  London Playbook

View all our political and policy newsletters

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to unsubscribe.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Rally Over?

What 2025 has in store ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌...