Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. Breaking: On Wednesday night, the House voted 314-117 to pass the Fiscal Responsibility Act, clearing a major hurdle in advance of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s June 5 deadline to raise the debt limit. While the bill is expected to pass the Senate, lawmakers like Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) could throw up procedural hurdles to drag the fight into the weekend. Back to our regularly scheduled programming. Wall Street spent decades building the necessary relationships in Beijing to power multibillion dollar investment funds and countless cross-border partnerships. Keeping those relationships could get a lot more difficult — particularly for U.S. firms focused on the technology sector. Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Rosen told the Senate Banking Committee on Wednesday that President Joe Biden’s long-awaited executive order on outbound investments will embolden regulators to review and deny U.S. financing for Chinese advanced microchips, artificial intelligence and quantum computing, our Gavin Bade reports. (If you haven’t already, check out Gavin’s killer report on Biden’s efforts to craft a new economic order). “What we are currently working toward is a program that restricts the flow of U.S. investment dollars that comes with know-how and expertise into certain and specific sectors and subsectors of concern,” Rosen said. That includes projects that could benefit “their military, intelligence capabilities and mass surveillance.” He later said the administration would take a “tailored, narrow, administrable and understandable approach” to ensure the businesses affected would have a clear sense of how they will have to comply. That could be tricky. Some of these technologies will no doubt have both benign and harmful uses. Sussing out if financiers have invested in good or bad actors — particularly if those actors are subject to some Chinese government oversight — could be like untangling a plateful of noodles. And that only gets tougher as more businesses look to invest in technologies that could be subject to outbound review. American efforts to throw up barriers to certain corners of the Chinese market has led many to fear that their deeply intertwined economies could eventually decouple. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told Bloomberg in Shanghai that those fears are slightly overblown and that his bank, the largest U.S. lender, would stay in China even though relations between the two countries are “far more complex now.” “Over time, there’ll be less trade,” he said. “It’ll take years for this thing to take place, but it won’t be a decoupling and the world will go on.” In the meantime, U.S. and global businesses are scrambling to keep up with an increasingly complex geopolitical order that’s created what Jared Cohen of Goldman Sachs dubbed “geopolitical swing states” — increasingly powerful nations that will sway between the U.S., China and Russia without locking into any alignment. That could force “a reorientation of where capital flows,” he said in an interview. “I think most companies are going to have to sort of reactively navigate this from a commercial perspective.” He added: “They're thinking about it not dissimilarly to how certain countries are thinking about it. Which is: what advantages and leverage do I have in this particular moment to ride the geopolitical wave?” Read more from my conversation with Cohen here. IT’S THURSDAY — All eyes now turn to the Senate. Send tips, gossip and suggestions to Sam at ssutton@politico.com and Zach at zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment