PBMS FACE THE MUSIC — Pharmacy benefit managers are bracing for a hard week on the Hill. The Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing Thursday on the impact PBMs — the pharmaceutical middlemen that negotiate drug discounts with drugmakers and design prescription drug benefits for health plans — have on the health system. The House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee is also expected to look into how much value PBMs add as part of a broader discussion about fairness in the health care market, according to a memo shared with Megan. The hearings could suggest what’s to come for what lawmakers, lobbyists and the administration consider a key issue for the rest of the year. What PBMs are saying: They argue they’re misunderstood. J.C. Scott, who leads the industry group for PBMs, said earlier this month that his members “have a proven track record of reducing prescription drug costs.” His group, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, is running an ad campaign touting the benefits PBMs offer and slamming a bipartisan bill to rein them in, which was recently advanced by the Senate Commerce Committee. PBMs say they’re already subject to transparency rules and instead support a pack of patent reform bills that would crack down on ways drugmakers prevent cheaper generics and biosimilars from coming to market. What lawmakers will likely point out: The three largest PBMs — CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx — control roughly 80 percent of the prescription drug market. They also each have affiliated pharmacies and own, or are owned by, insurance companies. The administration angle: During hearings last week featuring HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, a bipartisan set of lawmakers homed in on PBMs, Ben reports from the Hill. “There is a growing concern that the middlemen … are skimming off a good deal of the money,” Becerra said. “We’re going to try to move to make sure that if there’s a middleman … that it’s done efficiently.” It’s not just HHS: The Federal Trade Commission is studying how the industry affects consumer drug prices. And there’s more: Several Senate HELP Committee members have suggested they want to turn a critical eye toward PBMs, and staffers tell your host to expect more action in the future. Plus, the House Oversight and Accountability Committee has launched an investigation into the industry’s effect on patients. WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE, where we’re intrigued by the new interior design trend: mushrooms. Are you the proud owner of a mushroom-shaped lamp? Or maybe you have a tip about this week’s PBM hearing on the Hill. Either way, drop us a line at dpayne@politico.com and kmahr@politico.com. TODAY ON OUR PULSE CHECK PODCAST, host Carmen Paun talks with Erin Schumaker, who discusses a U.S. Department of Defense–funded $3 million collaboration between UMass Lowell and Soar Technology to find the best human decision-making attributes artificial intelligence can imitate and the value of training AI to handle situations in which there are no clear right or wrong answers.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment