What a difference a decade can make. Ten years ago, President Barack Obama delivered a State of the Union address that bragged about the natural gas boom — "We need to encourage that" — and touted his "all of the above" energy policy. He talked up renewables as well, of course, but Obama vowed to speed up oil and gas permitting and praised domestic oil production. On Tuesday, President Joe Biden went in front of Congress with a slightly different message. “The climate crisis doesn't care if you are in a red or blue state," he said. "It is an existential threat. We have an obligation, not to ourselves, but to our children and grandchildren, to confront it.” Biden baited Republicans into cheering by ad-libbing that the U.S. will need oil “for at least another decade and beyond that” — an undeniable fact, unless the country were to revert overnight to some sort of preindustrial agrarian society. But he used the near-consensus among energy analysts not to highlight his moderation but to bash oil companies for using record profits to fund stock buybacks. Republicans have also shifted their tune on climate change. Ten years ago, Sen. Marco Rubio’s official GOP response to Obama’s speech included the line that “no matter how many job-killing laws we pass, our government can’t control the weather.” (Yes, this was the same speech as the sip of water heard ‘round the world). Just a week earlier, the Florida Republican had said “reasonable debate” existed on whether humans are warming the planet. The GOP soon went much further. Two years later, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) tossed a snowball on the Senate floor to argue that human activity doesn’t affect the climate. (Total D.C. accumulation so far this winter: 0.4 inches. Today’s high: 61 degrees F.) And 2016 brought President Donald Trump, who argued climate change was a Chinese-invented hoax and later pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement. Republican reaction this time was different. House Energy Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) didn’t deny that climate change is real, and instead accused Biden of leading a “rush to green” that puts the U.S. at the mercy of China’s mineral supply. She also dinged Biden's climate law for using "massive government subsidies” to champion “unreliable, weather-dependent” wind and solar power. Does a GOP shift from arguing that “the climate is always changing” to warning that cars are going electric too quickly actually prop open the door in Washington for real policy debates? And what will the Republican stance be in another 10 years? Happy Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Alex Guillén. Arianna will be back soon! Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@eenews.net.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment