The first Congressional crypto hearing of the post-FTX era went down on Capitol Hill yesterday, Axios' Crystal Kim reports. Why it matters: The spectacular flameout of crypto exchange FTX — and the contagion that preceded and followed it — could finally provide momentum for U.S. regulation of the industry. Driving the news: At yesterday's hearing, the Senate agriculture committee chairwoman Debbie Stabenow highlighted the "lack of clear, consistent rules" that have allowed the industry to flourish, while American consumers lose billions. - "When exchanges accept customer funds for trading, they must not be allowed to gamble with those funds," Sen. Stabenow (D-MI) said, referencing one of the issues behind FTX's unwinding.
Go deeper: Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman Rostin Behnam was the sole witness at the hearing. - He emphasized the need for lawmakers to grant his agency the authority to create rules and oversee crypto trading.
- "We need surveillance of market activity," Behnam said.
Worth noting: Behnam also expressed support for Stabenow's Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act (DCCPA) — which he says would have "prohibited" some of the actions at FTX from taking place. Catch up fast: The most recent version of the proposed measure would place many cryptocurrencies under the purview of the CFTC. - Stabenow during the hearing said that the legislation would still allow the Securities and Exchange Commission to have oversight over crypto that it deems securities.
- Yes, but: The DCCPA has received criticism for its connection to none other than FTX and its disgraced founder, Sam Bankman-Fried — it's been called the "SBF bill" due to their perceived influence over it.
The intrigue: While crises can be big motivators for elected leaders to reactively push through regulations, some lawmakers may not want to do anything that appears to legitimize cryptocurrency right now, as Axios' Brady Dale wrote. - An op-ed in FT Alphaville argues just that. "Just let crypto burn," wrote Stephen Cecchetti of Brandeis International Business School and Kim Schoenholtz of NYU's Stern School of Business.
- "Actively intervening would convey undeserved legitimacy upon a system that does little to support real economic activity," they wrote.
What we're watching: Yesterday's hearing was presumably just the beginning. - Notably absent was "any witness who can speak on behalf of the banking industry or the FDIC, Fed, Treasury, OCC, or CFPB," said Jenny Lee, a former bank regulator who's now a partner at the law firm Reed Smith, in an email.
Next up: The House financial services committee scheduled a Dec. 13 hearing entitled "Investigating the Collapse of FTX, Part I." |
No comments:
Post a Comment