Tuesday, November 15, 2022

Is the 'Stadium Curse' Fact or Fiction?

Last week saw one of the greatest fiascos to hit the land of cryptocurrencies... On Friday, crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy. It could be another example of the "Stadium Curse"... The blowup comes less than two years after FTX shelled out $135 million to replace American Airlines' (AAL) naming rights for the home of […]
Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page here.

Is the 'Stadium Curse' Fact or Fiction?

By Herb Greenberg


$7 Trillion Disaster No One Sees Coming

While you likely feel paralyzed about whether to buy, sell, or hold, one of world's top financial journalists has uncovered a story that could make history... And his research says that things are about to go from bad to worse. Click here for the full story.


Last week saw one of the greatest fiascos to hit the land of cryptocurrencies...

On Friday, crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy. It could be another example of the "Stadium Curse"... The blowup comes less than two years after FTX shelled out $135 million to replace American Airlines' (AAL) naming rights for the home of the NBA's Miami Heat – changing the venue name from American Airlines Arena to FTX Arena.

Now, the tables have turned... Miami-Dade County and the Heat are taking action to end their business relationships with FTX and instead find a new partner for naming rights to the arena.

Not that any of this should have been a surprise...

As I said in Empire Financial Daily last November, almost a year ago today, the companies that put their names on stadiums and arenas have an outsized tendency of running into trouble – and not just bankruptcy, but fraud and corruption.

Among the most famous stadium-naming blowups: Enron, Conseco, PSINet, Chesapeake Energy, Adelphia, and CMGI. As I said back then...

If you've been around since stadium naming rights were a thing, you knew exactly what I was thinking: That this is yet another sign of bubble-bubble-toil-and-trouble.

Since they often reflect the egos of those involved, naming rights have a history of picking the tops of some stocks... and even being a precursor of trouble for the company whose name is up in neon.

When I wrote that, Crypto.com, another crypto exchange, had just agreed to replace Staples as the namesake for the home of the NBA's Los Angeles Lakers...

As it turns out, the deal was announced two weeks after bitcoin peaked. Since then, the crypto has plunged by more than 70%.

You could see that one coming...

And it's not alone. Among recent examples:

  • In May 2019, cloud-based communication company RingCentral (RNG) paid $1 million per year for rights to the Oakland Coliseum in California...
  • Back in 2004, retailer Petco Health and Wellness (WOOF) paid for a 22-year, $60 million deal to name the new stadium for MLB's San Diego Padres. In March 2021, Petco and the Padres extended the naming rights deal through 2027...
  • In August 2019, travel and hospitality company Allegiant Travel (ALGT) paid $25 million per year for the stadium naming rights for the NFL's Las Vegas Raiders...
  • In July 2021, gaming giant Caesars Entertainment (CZR) signed a 20-year, $138 million deal with the NFL's New Orleans Saints for naming rights to the city's Superdome...
  • All of them are pikers compared with online personal finance company SoFi Technologies (SOFI). In September 2019, it agreed to pay $625 million over 20 years for naming rights to the home of the NFL's LA Rams and LA Chargers. SoFi's stock has fallen by nearly half since the June 2021 initial public offering ("IPO")...
  • Or consider what happened after the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert changed the name of Quicken Loans Arena in 2019 to Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse. Since its August 2020 IPO date, mortgage loan provider Rocket Companies (RKT) has seen its stock cut in half...

Recommended Link:

Warning: Massive supply crisis ahead... ACT NOW

Even as inflation continues to cripple investors, and the economy heads into a recession... demand for one critical element is set to soar. In fact, some countries have already begun stockpiling it to get ahead of the curve. The last time supply and demand of this key element got slightly imbalanced, savvy investors could've made 30 times their money in less than 6 years. Before you buy a single share of stock to take advantage of this event, see what's causing this massive shift right here.


But to be fair, not every company that slaps its name on a stadium or arena blows up...

In June, John Rekenthaler, vice president of research for Morningstar, did an admittedly quick study of the performance of the stocks of stadium and arena sponsors.

His starting point was 2002, and he stuck with just football, basketball, and baseball. He found 36 sponsors. Of those, 16 are still around... and are still sponsors.

Of those whose stocks no longer trade... some went bankrupt, but most others were acquired.

For technical reasons, he could only calculate returns on 12. As the chart below shows, in general they've done pretty well...

Or as Rekenthaler put it...

As with the apparent outcome for the defunct stocks, the performance of the listed stocks has been better than advertised, but not great. Although stadium sponsorship was not a glaring contrarian signal, nor was it a positive sign. Too many sponsors have either occupied eroding industries, such as banks and airlines, or been on the bleeding edge of technology. Consequently, most of the stadium sponsors trailed the stock-market index...

While I would hesitate to call stadium-sponsor stocks successful, given their high dropout rates and the fact that they required an unrealistically frequent rebalancing schedule to thrive, they have not been outright failures. The curse is a myth.

If you look at that chart, most sponsor deals date from years earlier... and these companies paid nothing like the companies today are paying.

In the end, the question you need to ask is this... Is paying hundreds of millions of dollars to name a stadium really the best use of company money? Is the free cash flow really that good? Is the balance sheet really that clean? Heck, is the business profitable?

If the answers to any of those questions are "no," then maybe there's one more question you need to ask – especially if the company in question is newly public, is trying to reinvent themselves, or is run by a CEO who believes their own press clippings and confuses their stock with the company...

Is this all little more than a ruse to use cash to create an illusion of credibility?

History shows, it often is.

Before we go, with the recent collapse of FTX, crypto, special purpose acquisition companies ('SPACs'), and the overall market, here's something to think about...

Who will be advertising on the Super Bowl this go-around? As my colleague Enrique Abeyta recently tweeted, referring to last year's event...

Source: Twitter/@enriqueabeyta

Easy come, easy go.

As always, feel free to reach out via e-mail by clicking here. I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Herb Greenberg
November 15, 2022

Get a 60-day, 100% money-back trial to Empire Real Wealth by clicking here.

If someone forwarded you this e-mail and you would like to be added to the Empire Financial Daily e-mail list to receive e-mails like this every weekday, simply sign up here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Don't Ignore This - Get MarketClub Free

We want to show you how to get 6 months of MarketClub at no cost. ...