RED OCTOBER — Over the past two weeks, Republicans have gained ground in the battle for control of Congress. In its latest round of updates, POLITICO's election forecast moved multiple House races in the GOP's direction. Republicans have pulled into a slight lead on the so-called generic congressional ballot, according to the FiveThirtyEight polling average , and the FiveThirtyEight forecast now puts the chances of Republican control of the House at 81 in 100, up from 69 in 100 on Oct. 6. But polling in recent election cycles has been unreliable, and this year has already seen seismic shifts in expectations — from a predicted GOP landslide early in the year to signs of hope for Democrats as recently as last month. With 15 days to go until the 2022 midterms, Nightly reached out to POLITICO National Politics Editor Scott Bland to make sense of the gyrations. It seems like the winds have shifted slightly toward the GOP in recent polls and forecasts. How much can we believe there's a noteworthy shift, and what might be behind it? In most of our recent elections, especially midterms, things have tended to go very wrong at the end for the party that lost. So it's not unusual to see some late momentum that carries through to Election Day. One thing I've noticed is that it seems like in a lot of places (though not all) where the GOP has seen recent polling improvement, it's more about the Republican candidate's numbers trending up than the Democrat necessarily sinking. So we're seeing a lot of situations where Republican voters unifying and some swing voters picking against the party in power are nudging GOP candidates past Democrats who have been ahead — but have never been above 50 percent of the vote. Do you expect that trend to continue through Election Day? Or is there a chance of numbers staying in the same place or moving again in a different direction? I would never, ever say that we're locked into anything — especially, though not exclusively, because polling is a tricky thing to do right now. And one of the hardest things about it is figuring out who is going to vote and in what numbers. Obviously those sorts of calculations can really change the boundaries of what might possibly happen. That said, one of the troubling signs for Democrats of late has been the relatively large shares of undecided voters who are sour on President Joe Biden and the economy. It stands to reason it's harder — not impossible, but harder — to try to drag those undecideds into the Democratic column on Election Day and an easier sell to get them to vote for the GOP. Turning specifically to the House for a second, we've moved from an environment six to nine months ago when there was discussion of a GOP landslide, to some discussion over the late summer of possibly a single-digit GOP gain and even Democrats having a chance at keeping the chamber. How would you describe the environment now? Can Dems make any sort of persuasive argument that they can keep the House? I'm going to lean for a moment on Ally Mutnick , our ace House campaigns expert, who has said that some of the Democrats she talks to say they can see a path to a really slim, 1- or 2-seat majority, but not beyond that. So that really tells you what kind of situation they're in. It feels like we're in an environment somewhere between one of the big recent backlash midterms, like 2010 or 2018, and a more neutral environment. That's obviously positive territory for Republicans, but it's hard to gauge just how positive — and like you've mentioned, there are these long-tail scenarios to consider of it turning into a GOP blowout on one end or, on the other, of Democrats somehow squeaking out a good election. The thing for House Democrats is that in order to keep the House, they have to scoop up a bunch of GOP-held districts that Biden won, to offset expected losses elsewhere. But they are having to play so much defense that it's been hard to invest in all of those races. There are just so many avenues for House Republicans to go down to flip the chamber, between redistricting, retirements and a lot of Dem incumbents in swingy seats. Does it look like the polls this cycle have improved? Obviously we won't know for sure until election night, but are pollsters controlling for errors they may have made in previous cycles? They are certainly trying! It's just really hard to get a representative sample of people to pick up the phone — or answer a text or whatever your mode of communication is — right now. Those response rates have been dropping toward zero for years, and of course the rates vary significantly among different subgroups with different political leanings. The thing I'm most on the lookout for is whether there's another polling error in the Midwestern/mid-Atlantic battleground states. That's where the biggest problems were in 2020, stemming from difficulty contacting Trump supporters in states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and it also happens to be where some Democratic candidates have been running notably ahead of the fundamentals this year. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight's author at cmchugh@politico.com or on Twitter at @calder_mchugh .
|
No comments:
Post a Comment