The Supreme Court is at it again. Monday kicks off another term of cases that could fundamentally reshape environmental regulation in the U.S., with major consequences for the climate. The court's six-justice conservative supermajority is newly emboldened after a series of decisions last term that upended abortion access, scaled back the federal government's response to the Covid-19 pandemic and limited the Environmental Protection Agency's power to curb planet-warming emissions. The court's term opens Monday with arguments in a case called Sackett v. EPA. The gist: Chantell and Michael Sackett want to build a house near Idaho's Priest Lake, but EPA regulations are making that difficult. If they win, the court could restrict EPA's ability to protect wetlands, which act as carbon sinks, absorbing CO2 and filtering out chemicals, human waste and other pollutants. The case also presents another opportunity for the court to handcuff agencies in a manner that could ripple far beyond environmental law. The Supreme Court took that approach last term in West Virginia v. EPA when, instead of narrowly rejecting a far-reaching Obama-era power plant emissions rule, the conservative justices offered a new tool — the major questions doctrine — for opponents of federal efforts aimed at stopping global climate change, addressing public health emergencies and combating racial injustices. Soon to come on the court's docket is a case that will determine whether the University of North Carolina and Harvard University violated civil rights law and the Constitution by using race as a factor in admissions That could have major implications for the Biden administration's attempts to correct generations of policies that have led to disproportionate pollution in predominantly Black communities. President Joe Biden has set a goal that 40 percent of new federal investment go toward overburdened and underserved areas. The Supreme Court may also pick up a case that could help fossil fuel companies avoid paying for climate change damages. In Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder County , major oil companies are asking the court to throw a hurdle in the path of local governments demanding they foot the bill for the massive toll changing climate is taking. The oil industry won a similar Supreme Court case in 2021, which delayed two dozen climate liability lawsuits that accuse the fossil fuel firms of deceiving the public and worsening the effects of global warming. The justices are currently discussing whether to add Suncor and other cases to their docket, so stay tuned. You can read more here about the court's upcoming environmental agenda.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment