World Bank President David Malpass is not a scientist. He's also far from the first person to say this while casting doubt on the reality of human-caused climate change. The former Trump official reminded the world of his lack of scientific credentials Tuesday when pressed by a New York Times reporter during Climate Week NYC. "I don't even know — I'm not a scientist," he said in response to repeated questions about whether he accepts the science of climate change. Malpass has spent the rest of the week doing damage control. "It's clear that greenhouse gas emissions from human activity are adding to — are causing — climate change," he told POLITICO's Ryan Heath in an online conversation Friday, in which he said he regrets his "poorly chosen line." "I am not a denier," he said Thursday during an appearance on CNN International. Despite Malpass' backtracking, climate groups from around the world have called on the World Bank's board of directors to fire him. Doing little to reassure his critics, Malpass offered to meet with some climate scientists while continuing to stress the need for fossil fuels in some parts of the world. The immediate backlash and Malpass' swift pivot highlight one difference between today and six or seven years ago, when a series of Republican politicians faced few if any consequences for proffering their lack of scientific experience to avoid answering questions about climate change. "What I have said repeatedly is I'm not a scientist," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told a Kentucky sports radio show in 2014, shortly before his commanding reelection victory. "Listen, I'm not qualified to debate the science over climate change," then-Speaker John Boehner of Ohio said at a news conference earlier that year. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio got the ball rolling in 2012 when he said, "I'm not a scientist, man," in response to questions about how old the planet is. New York magazine ran a story around the time titled, "Why Do Republicans Always Say 'I'm Not a Scientist'?" Malpass' about-face may demonstrate that expressions of climate denial are no longer as tolerable, but that doesn't make achieving the emissions reductions needed to stave off catastrophe any easier. And critics point out that the World Bank has been far less aggressive than other international banks in backing away from fossil fuel financing, as Corbin Hiar, Avery Ellfeldt and Sara Schonhardt report for POLITICO's E&E News.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment