Some exclusive news to kick off your morning: The Heritage Foundation’s political arm is taking a new swing in the right’s fight to stop a central bank digital currency. Heritage Action will tell Capitol Hill offices today that it plans to grade lawmakers based on their support for anti-CBDC legislation from Rep. Tom Emmer and Sen. Ted Cruz. It will be part of the group’s conservative scorecard that analyzes where House members and senators stand on “key votes” and, in the case of the CBDC bills, co-sponsorships. “Anti-CBDC legislation is necessary to safeguard Americans' financial privacy in the face of potential surveillance, control and political intimidation,” Heritage Action Executive Vice President Ryan Walker said in a statement. Heritage's campaign illustrates the extent to which anti-CBDC skepticism is becoming ingrained on the right, fueled by fear that a revamped digital dollar would give the government new control over everyday life. Former President Donald Trump recently joined the movement, vowing to stop the Federal Reserve from launching a CBDC in the name of protecting Americans from “government tyranny.” It also comes as the GOP increasingly embraces the crypto industry, which is helping stoke opposition against a government-run digital currency. The upshot is that it’s going to be very hard – and potentially impossible – for the U.S. to get to a place where Congress blesses the idea of the Fed launching a CBDC. Fed Chair Jerome Powell says the central bank needs approval from lawmakers and the executive branch. The genesis of the effort is Emmer’s bill, which has 97 GOP co-sponsors. Cruz introduced a companion bill Monday with Republican co-sponsors including Sens. Bill Hagerty, Rick Scott, Ted Budd, Mike Braun and Kevin Cramer. Their legislation would prohibit the Fed from issuing a central bank digital currency directly to consumers or via banks. (Banking and crypto industry groups also support the proposal.) “We are grateful for the support of Senator Cruz on this important legislation that ensures the United States’ digital currency policy upholds the American values of privacy, individual sovereignty and free-market competitiveness,” Emmer said in a statement. The move by the lawmakers is a reminder that distrust of the Fed is an inescapable and almost primordial element of U.S. politics. It’s why Powell’s savvy navigation of Congress, and his ability to insulate the Fed from attacks on the left and the right, have been so noteworthy. “The argument against central bank digital currency echoes other fights against increasing the power of the central bank, a theme in American politics since our founding,” said Aaron Klein, a Brookings Institution senior fellow. “That more members of Congress have not weighed in against an expansion of the Fed's powers like this is evidence of the Fed's incredibly bipartisan political clout in Congress and especially within the Biden Administration.” It's worth noting that Powell hasn’t tried to rally lawmakers behind a CBDC. Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who heads the central bank's internal payments committee, has voiced more outright skepticism about the idea. What’s the tradeoff for the U.S.? Beyond the potential harms or benefits for individuals, other countries are moving ahead. The geopolitical fallout may be that America loses an opportunity to put its stamp on standards for the next generation of global payments, including when it comes to privacy and cybersecurity. According to an Atlantic Council tracker, more than 130 countries are exploring a CBDC. A potential digital euro just entered the ECB’s “preparation phase,” and a digital pound is under consideration by the Bank of England and His Majesty’s Treasury. “We have to bring something to the table if we don’t like the alternatives that are being built," said Atlantic Council senior director Josh Lipsky. "Or we’ll see a more fractured international payments system get built up around us.” It’s Tuesday — Have big policy news that MM readers would care about? Send a heads up to zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment