DOJ TO CHAMBER: CALL THE TAXMAN — In its latest court filing, the Biden administration has responded to some of the legal arguments made by the pharmaceutical industry and its allies against Medicare drug price negotiation authority. The DOJ’s motion to dismiss the U.S. Chamber of Commerce lawsuit “included the government's first substantive response” to the industry’s legal claims about the program’s excise tax scheme and whether Congress properly delegated power to regulators, Zach Baron, director of Georgetown Law’s Health Policy and the Law Initiative, said. On the excise tax, which drugmakers say is excessively punitive, the Justice Department’s counter is simple: You’ve got the wrong guy. The Chamber and its co-plaintiffs “have not sued the Department of the Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) — the only agencies empowered to enforce the tax that Plaintiffs seek to enjoin and have declared unconstitutional,” the DOJ said in its motion. The Chamber and eight other lawsuits filed by drug companies and PhRMA challenge HHS and CMS — not the tax authorities. Existing law also precludes lawsuits from preemptively challenging a tax, the DOJ said, with precedent allowing for parties to sue for refunds once taxes are paid. On delegating authority: The DOJ also laid into the Chamber’s argument that the drug price program violates the Constitution’s nondelegation doctrine, a legal principle which holds that Congress cannot transfer its legislative authority to another government branch without offering an “intelligible principle” to guide regulators. The Supreme Court is taking up a slew of cases lodged by conservative groups challenging the administrative state this term, and the justices’ decisions could foreshadow how they’ll eventually consider industry suits targeting the Inflation Reduction Act. The high court is widely expected to weigh in on the Medicare program in the coming years. The Biden administration argued there’s ample precedent for the court to uphold lawmaker-directed delegations of power, and Congress clearly drew the lanes within which CMS could implement the negotiation program. “There is nothing about the IRA that warrants a departure from that unbroken line of precedent — in fact, Congress provided far more guidance to the agency here than in the many statutes that have been upheld by the Supreme Court and the Sixth Circuit,” the DOJ said, referring to the Ohio-based venue where the Chamber lawsuit was filed. What’s next: Briefing will continue in this case through the end of January. IT’S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. Your host is once again battling a day care plague at home. Stay safe out there, readers! Send news and tips to Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com or @Gardner_LM) or David Lim (dlim@politico.com or @davidalim). TODAY ON OUR PULSE CHECK PODCAST, host Ben Leonard talks with POLITICO global health reporter Carmen Paun, who takes stock of the fentanyl epidemic and its devastating and fatal impact over the past year.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment