ADDRESSING CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM — Schools are trying to figure out how to get students back in the classroom as educators and lawmakers look to address chronic absenteeism as the pandemic wanes. Between the 2018-19 and 2021-22 school years, an additional 6.5 million students became chronically absent, according to recent research out of Stanford University. Morning Education’s Mackenzie Wilkes spoke with Phyllis Jordan, who has been writing and researching about attendance for 14 years. The interview has been edited for length and clarity. MORNING EDUCATION: Some states are defining chronic absenteeism as missing 10 percent of the number of school days within a year. What’s the sort of significance there in having a set definition? PHYLLIS JORDAN: Ten percent of the school year, according to research, seems to be the tipping point for when absenteeism starts to really impact achievement. Obviously, any days you miss could impact your achievement, but there's a lot of research that ties that 10 percent figure to when students start to have trouble. Some places were saying well, let's just say 80 days or 15 days, but by doing 10 percent you give yourself a way to measure it throughout the year. You can go after two months and say who's missed four days, that's 10 percent of two months worth of school. And you could say these 10 kids have missed four days and you can start focusing on them right then and there. ME: What are some common misconceptions that either education leaders or policymakers have about chronic absenteeism? JORDAN: There's two main misconceptions. One is that we're talking about truancy, that this is some politically correct way to see truancy and it's a different measure altogether. Truancy is when kids are skipping school or missing school without an excuse. Chronic absenteeism counts up all the absences all the days of absences and sees who's missing 10 percent of the school year. Tracking [chronic absenteeism] is not supposed to be used to punish kids. It's supposed to be sort of a flashlight, who might be falling behind or why they might be falling behind. The other misconception, which is related to that, is for a long time, schools have taken what's called picking the roll, basically average daily attendance. And they'll say, “Oh, 95 percent of our kids showed up today. That's great.” But it doesn't tell you anything about who's missing in school and how much they missed. ME: Something that I found really interesting was that seeing something like free school meals improved attendance. I'm wondering what other out-the-box methods should schools be considering when trying to get kids in the classroom? JORDAN: School breakfast and school lunch are really important, especially the breakfast when parents know that their kids can get breakfast if they get them to school on time. It helps improve attendance and on-time attendance. There's a practice called positive greetings at the door — which a principal can do it at the front door or the school or a teacher can do it at the classroom — just greeting students, saying their name, sometimes you'll have a special little handshake. Just giving a student a sense that they belong there, that they're welcome there, that they're part of a group can be really effective. There are some places that have started putting laundry machines in schools because they find one of the barriers to kids getting to school is that they don't have any clean clothes. This is especially true in schools with uniforms.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment