At COP27 today, a United Nations-sponsored panel laid out what should define credible net-zero emissions pledges and pathways for companies, cities and states, Andrew writes. Why it matters: The report aims to bring order and trust to the murky world of net-zero target setting and preventing greenwashing. Driving the news: The report from a panel of 17 environmental experts, chaired by former Canadian climate minister Catherine McKenna, seeks to rein in practices that risk losing the trust of the public and failing to slow human-caused global warming. Zoom in: The report sets out 10 main recommendations for net-zero targets from nonstate actors. These include committing to immediate cuts in absolute emissions across a company's entire value chain, from suppliers to end users of products. - It calls for nonstate actors to publicly spell out transition plans that show both near-term emissions cuts and spending plans that are consistent with meeting their long-term targets.
- Making sure disclosed plans are comparable from one entity to the next is a way to prevent dishonest or incomplete carbon accounting.
- The expert group also recommends that companies shift from voluntary net-zero initiatives to a regulated process at the national level.
The big picture: It sets out "red lines" aimed at thwarting greenwashing: - Companies could not claim to be on their way to net zero while continuing to build or invest in new fossil fuel infrastructure, deforestation, or other environmentally damaging activities.
- "If fossil fuel companies think that they can expand production under a net zero target, they need to think again," said expert group member Bill Hare of Climate Analytics, in a statement.
- They also could not buy cheap emissions credits before cutting their own emissions.
- In addition, companies could not lobby against aggressive government climate policies either on their own or through trade associations.
- "They must align their advocacy, as well as their governance and business strategies with their climate commitments," the report states.
Between the lines: The group's recommendations would seem to contradict a forthcoming U.S. plan to have companies finance developing country transitions to clean energy through carbon credits. - However, it depends on how the credits are defined.
- The expert group encourages multinational companies to participate in such partnerships, albeit through the use of "high-quality credits," provided they have already taken certain actions on their own.
What they're saying: "We do need to be very clear about what's required, because people are saying they are carbon neutral, they are net zero, millions of other terms," McKenna told Axios. Such terms, she said, "have to mean things." Read the whole story. |
No comments:
Post a Comment