STOPPING THE NEXT INSURRECTION — President Joe Biden abandoned his inclinations toward bipartisanship today, blasting Republicans in an Atlanta speech for a raft of new GOP led state voting laws. For the first time, he backed the idea of allowing voting rights legislation to pass with a simple Senate majority rather than a filibuster-proof 60 bipartisan votes. "This is the moment to defend our democracy," Biden said today. Yet even some liberal-leaning election law experts say Biden's focus on voting rights obscures a larger threat to U.S. election integrity in the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential contest: The idea that a future election loser could subvert the country's electoral machinery to take power — in other words, the next insurrection might be successful. "It's the primary thing," Richard Pildes, an election law expert at New York University, told Nightly. Pildes and Ned Foley, an election law expert at Ohio State University, joined two conservative scholars in an op-ed to argue for the urgency of reforming the Electoral Count Act, a 150-year-old law that contains the rules for how Congress certifies a presidential election. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has expressed interest in reforming the law. Biden didn't mention the Electoral Count Act in his speech today. Biden picked the wrong moment to discard bipartisanship, Foley told Nightly today. "It was essential, in my judgment, to make common cause with every possible Republican," Foley said. In his view, the country's democracy is in crisis, one that requires Democrats to reach out to Republicans willing to buck former President Donald Trump — not give them a reason to unite against Democrats. Voting rights, at the moment, has become shorthand for a vast array of issues that have to do with voting and elections — everything from how congressional and statehouse districts get drawn to how elections are carried out to who is eligible to vote. Those issues are important, Foley said — he called Georgia's new limits on political organizations giving people waiting in a poll line food and water "ugly and obnoxious" — but he sees them as less dire than the threat that Trump or a future presidential loser could successfully overturn the will of the voters. Foley and Pildes propose to revise the Electoral Count Act to bar Congress from invalidating a state's electoral votes, unless a legislature sends competing slates of electors — which hasn't happened since 1876. "As long as the state itself has settled on who won that state through policies established in advance of the election, Congress has no role other than to accept those as being the state's electoral vote," they wrote in the Washington Post with Michael W. McConnell and Bradley Smith. Biden and the Democrats are instead pushing forward with two highly partisan bills that may not have even simple majorities to pass. And that don't address the law that the Capitol rioters hoped to exploit to keep Trump in office. It's a strategy that could backfire, Foley said, if it further drags election law into partisan, winner-take-all territory. Democrats are crying foul on state Republican election measures. In his speech today, Biden compared some of these laws to the kind of state control imposed by totalitarian regimes. And the feeling that the game is rigged is shared by the GOP: The vast majority of Republicans already believe Trump's false claims about the 2020 election. Democrats don't need to choose between their voting bills and Electoral Count Act reform, Pildes said, but he worries about this pervasive distrust in elections from every side right now. "That is a dangerous situation for any democracy," Pildes said. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight's author at rrayasam@politico.com, or on Twitter at @RenuRayasam.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment