DON'T BANK ON IT: Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has his sights set on creating a massive carbon credit bank, aiming to confront climate change in a way that also boosts farmers' bottom lines. But the USDA chief faces a difficult task of bringing both the right and left flanks of the agriculture sector on board, POLITICO's Zack Colman, Liz Crampton and Helena Bottemiller Evich report. Doubts abound: A carbon bank is one of Washington's most ambitious attempts to curb global warming by making certain changes. One could involve paying farmers to plant extra crops (for instance, products like cereal rye and clover) that suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and bury it in soil. Some environmentalists, however, doubt it would make a big enough dent in climate change, especially compared to existing conservation programs. Farmers and ranchers worry that big agribusinesses and financial institutions will reap most of the monetary benefits from the carbon market. The industry also remains generally wary of any action on climate change that could affect producers' bottom lines. The timeline: USDA is planning to take some action by the end of 2021, according to a senior official, who told POLITICO that the department aims to strike a balance between "moving really quickly and also being deliberate enough that we can bring folks along with us." Convincing Congress: There's an ongoing debate between Vilsack and top Republicans, including Senate Agriculture ranking member John Boozman (Ark.), as to whether USDA has authority to create a carbon bank through the Commodity Credit Corporation. The loosely restricted $30 billion fund, intended to bolster the farm economy, was used to pay producers burned by the Trump administration's trade war and supply chain disruptions during the pandemic. "USDA believes they have the legal authority," said Andrew Walmsley, director of congressional relations for the Farm Bureau. "I don't know if they have the political authority. That's important." Also happening: Separately, President Joe Biden has invited leaders from 40 nations to his Climate Summit on April 22, Zack reports. LAND GRAB IN THE FARM BELT: The cost to buy or rent farmland in the Midwest continues to climb higher, fueled by high commodity prices, unprecedented federal aid and low interest rates, The Wall Street Journal reports. Farmers are placing larger and larger bids on parcels, according to brokers in the region, in a rush to acquire valuable property and ramp up production after years of pain in the industry, caused by trade headwinds, crop gluts and the pandemic. — Some farmland is even selling for a higher price than during the agricultural boom nearly a decade ago, when land values more than tripled in top farm states like Iowa and Nebraska. The downside: Many farmers, especially younger producers, don't have the resources to compete for available land that's selling for a premium. It's not just higher demand: America's farmland has shrunk by 25 percent since 1950, according to USDA data. Large agricultural operations now dominate most of the remaining 900 million acres. Just 13 percent of farms control 75 percent of farmed croplands, per USDA. The steep prices only accelerate consolidation by preventing smaller farmers from expanding. |
No comments:
Post a Comment