Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. The time has come: After months of threats, House Republicans are about to spend July pummeling major Wall Street firms with hearings and bills designed to discourage climate- and social-investing practices. What should you expect from the House Financial Services Committee’s “ESG month”? Your MM host and POLITICO’s Eleanor Mueller have fresh intel after talking with committee members the last several days. The big initial focus: Showcasing ways to stop activists from forcing companies to take positions on environmental issues via the shareholder voting process. Republicans will pitch greater oversight of the biggest asset management firms — think BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street — as well as the two big proxy advisors, ISS and Glass Lewis, which issue recommendations on shareholder votes. Eleanor got the scoop Friday in a POLITICO Pro Q&A with Rep. Bill Huizenga, the Michigan Republican who leads the ESG working group that’s behind the committee’s effort. Among the group’s recommendations: Congressional scrutiny and legislation to rein in the influence of the biggest asset managers. “Investment advisers, asset managers, pension funds — I would argue some, not all, but certainly some — have been ignoring their fiduciary duty to shareholders or maybe de-emphasizing that,” Huizenga told Eleanor. “There's currently no requirement for asset managers to justify why they are voting for some of these things and especially if they're voting against an independent board. There's very little transparency with that.” The committee plans to vote on anti-ESG bills around the end of the month. In the lead-up, it will have a series of hearings that cover ESG investing and other areas of finance ensnared in climate and social debates. Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.) told MM that her capital markets subcommittee will focus on proxy advisory firms. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) said his housing and insurance subcommittee will look at impacts on home construction costs and property casualty insurance availability. How do Democrats fit into this? While some moderates — especially those in red states — have joined Republicans in the anti-ESG push, look for committee Democrats to highlight the obvious: The pro-business party of free markets is telling corporate America what it can’t sell to its own clients. (To be sure, MM can confirm that some committee Republicans would also prefer to focus on telling regulators what to do, rather than companies.) “We’ll continue to be the voice that's defending the fact that the market should have choice,” Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) told MM. Happy Monday — What do you think of the House GOP’s “ESG month”? Let us know: Zach Warmbrodt, Sam Sutton.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment