Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Actually, a recession is inevitable

Presented by American Edge Project: Tomorrow's conversation, tonight. Know where the news is going next.
Jun 22, 2022 View in browser
 
POLITICO Nightly logo

By Ben White

Presented by American Edge Project

RECESSION IS COMING! — You read it here first, people. Take it to the bank. The U.S. is headed toward an economic downturn. Because it always is.

We have clearly not — as some hoped during recent booms — repealed the business cycle and entered a period of permanent growth. Recessions always arrive.

So the question is not whether we are headed toward one. Because, well, duh.

The questions are: When will recession hit? What will cause it? And how bad will it be? 

And while we may not be in one yet (though it's possible we are), I'm sorry to report that the conditions are ripe for a slide in gross domestic product growth that lasts at least two quarters, the technical definition of recession.

I say we may already be in one because growth in the first quarter slid 1.5 percent. And analysts are mostly downgrading estimates for the second quarter to close to zero, based on slipping retail sales, plunging consumer and business sentiment and an aggressive Federal Reserve bumping up historically low interest rates to battle runaway inflation of close to 9 percent. The Atlanta Federal Reserve's "GDP Now" model pegs second quarter growth at 0.0 percent.

For real. Exactly zero. They probably won't nail it on the head. So the question is whether we'll get just a tiny bit of growth or a small decline. If the latter, well, that's a recession. But probably not one that people will notice very much — some of the recent declines had quirky inventory changes in them that should get reversed.

Consumer and business spending (the big drivers of the economy) have held up remarkably well, meaning if we do get a negative second quarter, we should bounce back at least a bit in the second half of the year.

The scary bit is really what happens next year and beyond. And economists, politicians, Wall Street traders and pretty much everyone else is growing more concerned that a significant downturn could arrive in 2023.

The main reason is obvious: Steady and significant rate hikes from the Fed often trigger at least mild recessions. It's a feature, not a bug. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues will never say it out loud. But they'd take a recession rather than allow prices to continue to spin out of control. The intent of hikes, after all, is to slow down consumer and business spending and thus arrest rising prices.

And the current Fed has its foot hard on the brakes at the moment, with a second three-quarter-point increase expected next month, followed by half-point increases in September and November, then by another quarter point in December.

These would still get the Fed's target rate only into somewhat normal range from effectively below zero. But mere anticipation of the moves has already driven mortgage rates to 6 percent. Interest rates on everything else, from auto loans to credit cards, will likely be headed significantly higher.

And this will happen as consumers are already drawing down their significant Covid-era savings to keep up with inflation. Credit card debt is rising, and servicing that debt is growing more expensive.

After booming during Covid, Americans' savings rate has taken a major dive. The figure hit just 4.4 percent in April, the lowest since September 2008 during the Great Recession.

Big companies like Tesla, Netflix and the trading platform Robinhood have spoken of hiring freezes and potential layoffs. The once-booming cryptocurrency market is a giant mess. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is talking about a "hurricane" possibly hitting the economy.

Oh, and politics won't help . The midterms could very well lead to divided government again in D.C., with Republicans taking at least one chamber on Capitol Hill. If that happens, it could easily take us back to the days of debt ceiling and government shutdown fights that plagued the economy and the Obama administration after the 2010 midterms.

Mix it all together — big rate hikes, strapped consumers, freaked-out executives and possibly gridlocked government — and there is potential for a quite significant recession.

But on the positive side, unlike the dot-com bust or the end of the housing bubble, there are no immediately blazing sirens suggesting huge structural problems in the economy that could make things terrible for a very long time.

"I don't think recession is imminent or the economy is about to fall off a cliff," Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, told Nightly. "What our concern is now is that longer-term recession risk is rising very sharply.

"A lot depends on how long these high prices last and how much the Fed slams rather than taps on the brakes."

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight's author at bwhite@politico.com or on Twitter at @morningmoneyben.

 

A message from American Edge Project:

Voters Focused on Inflation – Not Breaking Up Tech 

Midterm voters' top priorities for Congress are inflation (88%), national security (86%), and jobs (85%). 84 percent of voters agree "there are other, bigger problems facing the United States, we should not be focused on breaking up U.S. tech companies right now ." Read more from our poll in partnership with Ipsos.

 
What'd I Miss?

President Joe Biden gives prepared remarks.

— Biden blames Russia for gas prices: President Joe Biden blamed Russia's war in Ukraine for recent hikes in fuel prices again today, as he pushed for Congress to suspend the federal gas tax and asked oil companies to increase refining capacity and pass "every penny" of their savings from the proposed gas tax holiday on to consumers. He said states should also find other solutions, such as eliminating their own gas taxes or offering rebates to households. This combination could lower prices by about a dollar a gallon, he said.

— House GOP scorns bipartisan Senate guns deal: Roughly a third of the Senate Republican conference helped advance the package on Tuesday night. But that means little in the House, where even supporters are warning they don't expect anywhere near the same ratio of GOP votes once the bill crosses the Capitol. It's the latest break between not only House and Senate GOP leadership but also between rank-and-file members over the past year-and-a-half.

— GOP senator may block school meal funding deal over transgender policy fight: Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) is thinking about blowing up a bipartisan deal to extend school meals funding for millions of children because of a Biden administration policy banning discrimination against LGBTQ students who participate in lunch programs that receive the money. Current funding runs out June 30.

— Jan. 6 panel revises hearing schedule: Select committee Chair Bennie Thompson said today that significant new streams of evidence have necessitated a change to the panel's hearing schedule, including the potential for additional hearings. After Thursday — which will focus on former President Donald Trump's effort to deploy the Justice Department to help overturn the 2020 presidential election — House investigators will resume hearings in July, Thompson said.

— Judge delays Proud Boys trial: The trial for five Proud Boys leaders — facing seditious conspiracy charges related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol — will be postponed until at least December, a federal judge ruled today, citing the ongoing publicity and uncertainty surrounding the Jan. 6 select committee. The ruling ensures that one of the two highest-profile prosecutions arising from the Jan. 6 attack will drag beyond the two-year anniversary of the insurrection.

— Former Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum indicted on federal charges: Once a rising Democratic star, Gillum is facing a 21-count federal indictment alleging that he illegally solicited campaign contributions between 2016 and 2019 and promised political favors in return for the financial support. The period of time he's alleged to have broken the law includes his failed 2018 bid against Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

 

DON'T MISS DIGITAL FUTURE DAILY - OUR TECHNOLOGY NEWSLETTER, RE-IMAGINED:  Technology is always evolving, and our new tech-obsessed newsletter is too! Digital Future Daily unlocks the most important stories determining the future of technology, from Washington to Silicon Valley and innovation power centers around the world. Readers get an in-depth look at how the next wave of tech will reshape civic and political life, including activism, fundraising, lobbying and legislating. Go inside the minds of the biggest tech players, policymakers and regulators to learn how their decisions affect our lives. Don't miss out, subscribe today.

 
 
AROUND THE WORLD

RUSSIAN HACKERS TARGET U.S.Russian intelligence agencies have been hacking into scores of organizations in the U.S. and other Ukraine-allied countries, according to a Microsoft report that shows Russia waging a global cyberwar alongside its attacks in Ukraine.

In the report released today, Microsoft said that Russian hackers have attempted to infiltrate networks at more than 100 organizations in the U.S. and dozens across 42 other countries since Russia invaded Ukraine in February. Targets have included the foreign ministries of NATO states, humanitarian organizations, think tanks, IT groups and energy suppliers, writes Maggie Miller.

The hackers successfully infiltrated these networks in almost 30 percent of the attempts, and managed to steal data in about a quarter of those instances. The report illustrates the global breadth and reach of the Russian cyber campaign being waged to try to dissuade Ukraine's allies from providing aid or to disrupt their operations. The volume of attempted hacks is also significantly higher than previously reported.

The U.S. has been the main target, but Russian hackers have also directed attacks at Polish groups helping deliver humanitarian aid to Ukraine, along with organizations in Baltic nations and Turkey. Ukraine has also been widely targeted.

NOBODY LIKES TO GET AUDITED — State Department and USAID officials are refusing to provide information to the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction needed for multiple audits related to the fall of the Afghan government and the ensuing months of Taliban rule, the watchdog wrote in a June 22 letter to the secretary of State and USAID administrator, writes Lara Seligman.

State and USAID have in some cases ignored SIGAR's communications, declined to make officials available for interviews, and refused to permit the watchdog to travel internationally to conduct on-the-ground research, director John Sopko wrote in the letter, which POLITICO obtained.

SIGAR needs this information for multiple reviews related to, among other things, Kabul's collapse in August 2021, the transfer of funds to the Taliban, and humanitarian programs in support of the Afghan people, Sopko wrote.

Also on Afghanistan: Biden is "monitoring developments" from a deadly earthquake in Afghanistan and has ordered his administration "to assess U.S. response options."

 

A message from American Edge Project:

Advertisement Image

 
Nightly Number

21.3 million

The number of unprocessed tax returns by the end of May, about 1.3 million more than at the same time last year. Though the IRS has said that digging out of the mountain of filings is a top priority, the number of returns awaiting action has actually increased by 6.5 percent, National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins said in a report to Congress.

 

STEP INSIDE THE WEST WING: What's really happening in West Wing offices? Find out who's up, who's down, and who really has the president's ear in our West Wing Playbook newsletter, the insider's guide to the Biden White House and Cabinet. For buzzy nuggets and details that you won't find anywhere else, subscribe today.

 
 
Parting Words

Sen. John Cornyn speaks at the Texas GOP convention.

RECOIL — John Cornyn knew he'd face blowback at his home state's GOP convention for his bipartisan work on gun safety. He showed up anyway, write Burgess Everett and Olivia Beavers.

Faced with a chorus of boos and a rebuke from the Texas GOP over the weekend, Cornyn got a taste of what the reaction could be on the right for Republicans who vote for the Senate's bill designed to curb mass shootings in America. What's more, on Monday evening the NRA announced opposition to the package crafted by a quartet of senators that includes Cornyn, whose A+ rating from the gun group is probably about to take a downgrade.

But becoming the face of the gun safety deal is a risk worth taking for the fourth-term Republican after a shooter killed 19 children and two teachers in his state. Cornyn said in an interview on Monday that he feels "confident in what we've done," even as he prepares for a week of intraparty squabbling likely centering on his own central role in clinching the agreement.

"I'm committed to getting a result here. And I understand that some people are unwilling to listen," Cornyn said of his chilly reception back home. "I was there to explain my position and why I believed it would not jeopardize Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. And some people didn't want to hear about it."

It may take months for the political fallout to settle after Cornyn and Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) finalized their 80-page gun safety bill on Monday evening. Cornyn brought formidable GOP credentials to their four-person talks: A former state Supreme Court justice, state attorney general and two-time party campaign committee chair, he also spent six years as party whip. Former President Donald Trump even tried to make Cornyn the FBI director.

None of that may insulate Cornyn. Asked whether it would affect his standing, he replied: "Well, I guess we'll find out. I don't think so."

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

 

A message from American Edge Project:

From our midterm voter poll in partnership with Ipsos:

74 percent of voters agree that "breaking up U.S. tech companies will only hurt America's competitiveness on the global stage, at a time when our adversaries are becoming bolder."

69 percent of voters agree that "breaking up U.S. tech companies threatens our national security by letting China gain a technological upper hand."

Learn more.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop

Myah Ward @myahward

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to edwardlorilla1986.paxforex@blogger.com by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to unsubscribe.

No comments:

Post a Comment

22 spring outfit ideas to fight fashion-decision fatigue

Your Horoscope For The Week Of May 13 VIEW IN BROWSER ...