MAKE ENDORSEMENTS GREAT AGAIN — The Republican midterms in 2022 — there are a bunch more tonight, including in Georgia and Texas — have been a series of tests to determine whether Trumpism can be separated from the person of former President Donald J. Trump. Trump identified a strain of the Republican Party that was more anti-immigration, more anti-business, more anti-trade, more antiwar and more isolationist than the Reagan tradition that had been dominant for four decades. Based on the kinds of candidates who have been winning so far, there's no reason to think that the changes Trump introduced in his party are temporary. And yet, Trump-endorsed candidates keep losing, at least some of the time. David Perdue is expected to be the latest, as he is far behind Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp in tonight's Republican primary, despite Trump's enthusiastic backing. To make sense of this contradiction, Nightly chatted over Slack today with politics editor Scott Bland. This conversation has been edited. What's Trump's scorecard in the midterms so far? It depends what you want to keep score of. If it's any endorsement he's given at any point, then his endorsees have won a lot of primaries and lost only a few. But if you look only at the competitive races — where he's not just gliding in to endorse an incumbent on the final day — it's a more mixed bag. He helped boost J.D. Vance through his Senate primary in Ohio, and he might have helped do the same for Mehmet Oz, though we're waiting for the results pending a recount in Pennsylvania. But Trump's endorsees have also lost primaries for governor in two consecutive weeks now. Trump's chosen candidate in Nebraska lost on May 10, and then he endorsed the far-right Idaho lieutenant governor in a primary against the sitting governor. The incumbent won big on May 17. Georgia would be the third. Trump has been furious at Gov. Brian Kemp since the end of 2020 because Kemp certified the election results showing Trump lost. He made the biggest personal investment, in terms of both time and actual money, in Georgia. What does that record tell us about Trump and the Republican Party? Does the "Big Lie" — the claim that Biden and the Democrats stole the presidency — have fewer adherents than we think? Or does it just mean that endorsements don't matter as much as we journalists pretend they do? It seems pretty clear that Trump's endorsement isn't moving voters to the same degree that it used to, and it looks like that's especially true in state races for governor. But he's still the single biggest force in the party. I don't think Vance would have shot up at the end and won in Ohio, for example, if Trump hadn't picked him. Trump's false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him is deeply embedded in the GOP. Most of the candidates in open Republican primaries adhere to it as they try to get their foot in the door. But it's not the only thing Republican voters care about. Kemp is a very conservative Republican governor who can credibly argue that he's done a jillion other things conservatives wanted. Has Trump's role in these midterms affected who will win in November in any way? Is the GOP caucus likely to look materially different because of his endorsements? Has he picked anyone who won but is more likely to lose the general than the so-called establishment choice? (It's a little odd to call the choice of the former president of the United States antiestablishment.) A number of Republicans think Doug Mastriano, the GOP gubernatorial candidate in Pennsylvania, is essentially unelectable and are upset that Trump endorsed him. But at the same time, Mastriano probably would have won the primary if Trump had stayed out. Nothing at the congressional level jumps out in the same way, though there were a lot of early concerns among Republicans about Herschel Walker in Georgia. They don't seem to be as worried about his electability now, though it seems like there's always a new story about him overstating his business background or something else in his past. So there are no Todd Aikens or Christine O'Donnells this cycle for Democrats to pin their Senate-majority hopes on? Still plenty of time to figure that one out — those primaries were in August and September of their respective election years! Missouri is a possibility. A number of Republicans have been concerned that Trump could endorse former Gov. Eric Greitens, either because he'd prove unelectable or because they think he'd be a destructive force in the Senate. So look out for that one. Greitens, you may recall, resigned from office as fellow Republicans prepared to impeach him over allegations of sexual assault and blackmail. What else are you watching tonight? The Democratic fight in TX-28: the last anti-abortion House Democrat and his primary opponent. How likely is Rep. Henry Cuellar to survive? Cuellar and his challenger, Jessica Cisneros, have been on the ballot together twice before. She's run only a few points behind him both times, so it's fair to call it a toss-up. Cuellar could hardly have picked a worse time to be facing a pro-abortion rights challenger, with the salience of the issue skyrocketing among Democratic voters as the Supreme Court considers overturning Roe v. Wade. I'm very, very curious to see what happens in that race. Whoever wins, it looks set to be a general election battleground, too. Want to see tonight's results? There are plenty of ways to get election tallies and analysis tonight from our newsroom colleagues, including our pages for Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Minnesota and Texas. The ideal second-screen experience is our live chat with campaigns reporters and editors.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment