BACK TO CONGRESS: It's a bit of hardened conventional wisdom, but that doesn't make it untrue — the closer a big vote in Congress gets to an Election Day, the harder it can become. In other words, it's understandable to think the administration would face a heavy lift getting Pillar One changes through Congress next year, especially as key Republicans keep rolling out increasing doubts about the agreement. One potential boost, as Ben Koltun of Beacon Policy Advisors told The Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin, would be for the corporate community to put its shoulder behind the changes next year. (Another potential bonus — perhaps some distance between the battle over the partisan tax changes that Democrats want this fall and a vote on changing the allocation rules wouldn't be a bad thing.) Still, experts will say it's not clear the business world will unite behind the Pillar One changes — the Big Tech companies that have been targeted by unilateral digital taxes might have more incentive to get on board than other industries, and companies in other sectors could get wrapped up among the 100 or so big corporations that would be affected by the changes. And yet: There is a sense from both Republicans and Democrats that the old rules governing what countries get to tax what profits might need to change. Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho and Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the top Republican tax writers in Congress, pressed Treasury to make sure that Pillar One changes don't disproportionately come down on the U.S. But they also noted: "Congress has been open to a modest global profit allocation formula, applied neutrally, to replace the patchwork of unilateral digital taxes that target Americans." Further G-20 reading: "Brussels set to delay digital levy plan after G20 backs tax deal," according to The Financial Times. Plus: "France pushes for 25% target for taxing multinationals' super-profits," via Reuters. And: "Swiss See Opening for Tax Competition as G-20 Talks Advance," from Bloomberg. ABOUT THOSE PARTISAN CHANGES: The Senate heads back to Washington this week — and with August just around the corner, Democrats definitely have progress to make on getting a budget passed and kicking off the reconciliation process. Something else to consider: With Senate Budget Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on board, the chances seem pretty decent for Democrats to offer at least some relief to the $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions that Republicans put into place in the 2017 tax law. Democrats seeking to scrap the cap, like Reps. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Tom Suozzi of New York, say that will help protect their states' tax base by keeping more wealthy people from seeking out lower-tax states like Florida. But there is some conflicting research on that front, and the Democratic nominee for mayor in New York, Eric Adams, doesn't seem to see it that way. "We are not going to allow Miami and other places to take our businesses," Adams said on ABC's "This Week," adding that "65,000 New Yorkers pay 51 percent of our income taxes. You speak with them, the tax is not the problem. Public safety is the problem. We're going to let them know that this city is going to be safe." |
No comments:
Post a Comment