'A REAL OPPORTUNITY': Lawmakers are climbing over one another to carve out cash for their pet projects in an evolving infrastructure bill, and a growing number of defense boosters want in, our colleague Connor O'Brien reports for Pros. Bipartisan advocates of military depots and arsenals are now pressing House leaders to incorporate funding for a host of defense industrial facilities into a potential multitrillion-dollar package. Reps. Cheri Bustos of Illinois and Blake Moore of Utah, who co-chair the House Military Depot, Arsenal, Ammunition Plant and Industrial Facilities Caucus, are gathering support for a planned letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging money for long-deferred upgrades for military industrial facilities as well as defense labs and test facilities and ranges be incorporated into an infrastructure proposal. "The moral of the story here is that infrastructure is important to national security," Bustos said. "And if we can't surge our manufacturing to meet our needs in a time of crisis, there's national security implications to that." The push adds another potential complication to infrastructure negotiations that are marred by partisan disagreements over the scope and price tag of the legislation. Floodgates open? The latest move also comes after boosters of shipyards have also pressed for including the Navy's $21 billion plan to modernize its four public shipyards over the next 20 years. And more requests may be coming. "I think members whose districts are impacted see this as a real opportunity, so it's not just the shipyards," said Rep. Anthony Brown of Maryland. "I've spoken to a number of them, and my sense is they're probably going to make some requests." Not everyone is on board. Rep. John Garamendi, who chairs the HASC panel that oversees shipyards, depots and arsenals, said he'll "seriously oppose" funding defense projects through the infrastructure plan instead of the normal defense budgeting process. "I'm all for and [have] been a leading advocate. More than an advocate. Goddammit guys, you gotta rebuild these shipyards," Garamendi said of the Navy shipyard plan. "But that money comes out of the defense budget." Fiscal watchdogs have also complained the domestic investment package is not the place for a defense spending spree. 'FLIP THIS RATIO': The Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday held a confirmation hearing for President Joe Biden's picks to be Air Force secretary, undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, and the director of the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office. One focus was the challenge of high operating costs for weapons. Frank Kendall, the Air Force nominee, seemed resigned to sticking with the F-35 fighter jet, despite calling it "acquisition malpractice" when he was the Pentagon acquisition official in the Obama administration. Kendall said "the F-35 is the best tactical aircraft of its type in the world and will be so for quite some time. It's a complex, expensive weapon, unfortunately," as Defense News reported. "But it is a dominant weapon when it goes up against earlier generation aircraft." Heidi Shyu, a former Army acquisition boss who is Biden's pick to be the Pentagon's R&D chief, testified that the cost of operating new weapon systems must come down. "Today, sustainment makes up 70 percent of total weapon system cost, with development and procurement making up 30 percent," she said. "DoD should strive to flip this ratio and invest more in the development of new technologies than it does in the sustainment of legacy systems." Read up: Nominees' answers to advance policy questions | Pro hearing transcript. Related: Air Force secretary nominee pledges to tackle enduring pilot shortage, personnel issues, via Air Force Times. OTHER NOMINEES MOVE FORWARD: The SASC also approved Christine Wormuth to be Army secretary and Army Gen. Paul LaCamera to be the next commander of U.S. forces in South Korea, Connor also reports for Pros. Wormuth is the third civilian nominee approved by the committee in recent days after Mike McCord, the nominee for comptroller, and Ronald Moultrie, the choice for top Pentagon intelligence official. They now await confirmation by the full Senate. |
No comments:
Post a Comment