Senators: Urgency of indemnity law raised only in February. Inquirer Newsletter. February 24, 2021.

No images? Click here   POTENTIAL SUICIDE BOMBERS?   Two women with children in tow—their faces pixelized in this photo released by the military—are taken to police headquarters in Jolo, Sulu’s capital town, shortly after their arrest in a military-police raid on their homes on Friday. They are among nine women related to Abu Sayyaf leaders who have been arrested in separate raids in the province and described as “potential suicide bombers” by Lt. Gen. Corleto Vinluan Jr., chief of the military’s Western Mindanao Command.  —PHOTO COURTESY OF THE WESTERN MINDANAO COMMAND       Regions Island signs assert PH sovereignty TUGUEGARAO CITY—The military last week installed sovereign markers near Fuga Island in Aparri, Cagayan, to assert the Philippines’ right over these territories. The markers on the islands of Mabaag and Barit are visible to vessels passing through the country’s northern maritime territory and will help the government ensure that Philippine sovereignty will be recognized in these areas, Army officials said. —Story by Villamor Visaya Jr. Read more: philippinedailyinquirerplus.pressreader.com   World US high court OKs Trump tax probe NEW YORK—The United States Supreme Court allowed the release of Donald Trump’s tax records as part of an investigation into the ex-president’s finances. Criminal prosecutors initially asked for the files to examine payments made to two women who claimed they had affairs with Trump. Investigators now consider adding tax evasion and bank fraud charges. Trump called the probe a “witch hunt.” —Story by AFP Read more: lifestyle.inquirer.net   Newsletter / Join us Has this been forwarded by a friend? Subscribe now to the Philippine Daily Inquirer Newsletter and get your latest news and important updates on COVID-19. Subscribe     Get here   Banner Story Senators: Urgency of indemnity law raised only in February By DJ Yap It was already February when the government’s pandemic managers first apprised the Senate of the dire need for an indemnity law—yet they used the lack of it as an excuse for the country’s prolonged wait for coronavirus vaccines, the Inquirer learned on Tuesday. Three senators said the COVID-19 managers never raised the urgency of the no-fault clause until this month, when the first batch of the vaccines was already supposed to have arrived, despite publicly available documents indicating it was a requirement. No sense of urgency The delay was only the latest in a string of costly errors by the government’s COVID-19 planners, resulting from their “piecemeal focus” in procuring vaccines, according to Sen. Nancy Binay, who noted previous blunders involving the country’s handling of nondisclosure agreements with drug manufacturers and cold chain requirements, among other things. “Either they were clueless about the needed requirements or they simply had no sense of urgency,” Binay said in a statement to the Inquirer. Sen. Francis Pangilinan told the Inquirer that Health Secretary Francisco Duque III raised the matter of indemnification during the Senate’s committee of the whole hearings last December. “But at that time it was not presented as a necessary or indispensable prerequisite to the purchase of vaccines,” Pangilinan said. Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon said it was “only very recently” that the senators were told the country needed an indemnification law to get vaccines. “Why did it take the [Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases] so long to ask Congress to pass an indemnity law, or to submit the indemnity agreement to COVAX?” he said, referring to the global vaccine pool led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the vaccine alliance GAVI. “Now I ask: Did somebody drop the ball again?” Drilon said in a statement to the Inquirer. The no-fault or indemnity clause is a requisite for vaccine supply agreements set by COVAX and other multinational pharmaceutical companies. The Philippines, which has the second highest number of coronavirus cases and deaths in Southeast Asia, has not signed any supply contract for COVID-19 vaccines. Duque declined on Tuesday to comment on the COVAX requirements and referred the matter to Secretary Carlito Galvez Jr., the chief of the national vaccination program, “as he was the one heading the negotiations.” There was no immediate response from Galvez, who was still in a meeting on Tuesday night, according to a member of his staff. Available online By the last quarter of 2020, the Inquirer found that COVAX documents were already available online stating how all parties were supposed to hold the manufacturers free of liability in the event of harmful side effects from vaccination. An October 2020 document from Unicef, a COVAX partner, said “all participants allocated vaccines through COVAX will be required to indemnify the manufacturer for the vaccines deployed in their territory.” “Lack of such an indemnification will limit/delay access to vaccines,” it added. Another document released by Asian Development Bank last December said GAVI was negotiating “a model indemnification agreement that will be incorporated into agreements with manufacturers and requiring all COVAX participating countries to indemnify the manufacturer for the vaccines deployed in their country.” But not once through several congressional inquiries in November and December last year did Galvez expressly ask the Senate for an indemnification law. Delayed Pfizer delivery In fact, the first Senate bill that would create an indemnification fund, filed by Binay on Jan. 25, did not mention any request by the COVID-19 task force to hold the manufacturers free of liability due to harmful side effects of vaccination. Neither did the second one, filed by Sen. Ramon Revilla Jr. on Jan. 26. It was only the third bill, authored by Senate President Vicente Sotto III and submitted on Feb. 16, that described the no-fault clause as “one of the requirements of the vaccine manufacturers.” That was only after Galvez told the Senate on Feb. 11 that it was the country’s lack of an indemnification law that caused the delay in the arrival of the first batch of 117,000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine procured through COVAX. “If we had an indemnification law, the Pfizer [vaccines] would have arrived by Feb. 12,” Galvez told the senators. Sotto, in a message to the Inquirer, confirmed that Galvez did not ask the Senate for an indemnity bill. But that was “because Pfizer did not say so at first,” the Senate leader said. Binay, however, said the COVID-19 planners appeared to have been unaware of the urgency of the no-fault requisite. “If we are really serious in solving a public health problem in a pandemic level, we should never sacrifice the urgent for the important. [The] government has to immediately take action in handling the priorities when it comes to COVID response,” she said. Drilon said: “By all indications, the COVID-19 managers have mismanaged the procurement of coronavirus vaccines in the same way that the government mismanaged the pandemic.” Executive power What is puzzling, he said, is that President Duterte’s executive power is enough to meet the requirement. “The recent submission by the government of indemnity agreements with COVAX is proof that the government can hold the manufacturers free and harmless, except in cases of gross negligence and willful misconduct, without going to Congress,” Drilon said. The President “has full power to bind the country,” he said. Nevertheless, the Senate passed a bill on Tuesday expediting vaccine procurement with a special provision for a P500-million indemnification fund. This is separate from the stand-alone measures filed by Binay, Revilla and Sotto, which are still pending in committee. Health experts pointed out that COVAX requirements were the same for all countries and that these had been known since November last year, putting into question the claim of the government’s vaccine managers that they became aware of the indemnity agreement only recently. “We just failed to do a vaccination checklist so we dropped the ball again,” said Dr. Tony Leachon, a health advocate and former adviser to the government’s coronavirus response. “Blatant lies. The COVAX requirements are the same across the globe [and] already posted on [the] GAVI website,” said Dr. Gene Nisperos of Community Medicine Development Foundation. Nisperos said the Philippines was not being singled out, as officials had implied, and hit the government for “just making up excuses” for failing to do due diligence. Galvez, as well as presidential spokesperson Harry Roque, had said manufacturers were wary of supplying vaccines to the Philippines because of the lawsuit that another drug company, Sanofi Pasteur, faced due to the 2018 Dengvaxia controversy. ‘Manufacturers’ obligation’ Asked on Tuesday if Mr. Duterte was holding anybody responsible for the delay in vaccine delivery, Cabinet Secretary Karlo Nograles said the President knew that the matter was in the hands of the manufacturers. The government is doing all it can to comply with the requirements, he said. “But at the end of the day, it’s really the vaccine manufacturers’ obligation, responsibility to ship it to us at [the] time that was promised,” Nograles told a news briefing. Delivery dates for the AstraZeneca vaccine will be decided this week, Dr. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, the WHO representative to the Philippines, told a news briefing at the Department of Health on Tuesday. The Philippines has completed all the requirements for the vaccines it is qualified to receive from COVAX, Abeyasinghe said. “My understanding is that there is no requirement in the case of AstraZeneca for further exchange of letters, so we are optimistic that before the end of this week we will hear from the COVAX initiative on the likely delivery dates of AstraZeneca vaccines to the Philippines,” he said. Abeyasinghe confirmed that 5.5 million to 9.2 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine had been earmarked for the Philippines. —WITH REPORTS FROM LEILA B. SALAVERRIA, PATRICIA DENISE M. CHIU AND MARICAR CINCO   Read more: newsinfo.inquirer.net   Editorial Confounding and confusing Acting Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Karl Kendrick Chua last week appealed to President Duterte to shift the entire country to MGCQ as early as March 1, ostensibly to address the rising hunger incidence as millions have lost their jobs due to the quarantine restrictions that have been in place for close to a year. That the lobby was supported by the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF) and eventually seconded by the majority of the mayors of Metro Manila, in the face of scientific data against such a move and with the first COVID-19 jabs yet to arrive, left many citizens dumbfounded. But that has been, from all appearances, the confounding pattern of the administration: Approve the policy first, then consider the possible dire consequences later, leading to unnecessary vexation among the implementing local government unit (LGU) leaders and confusion among Filipinos already chafing under the world’s longest lockdown. The IATF, for example, recently approved the reopening of cinemas, apparently without consulting LGUs and without the corresponding guidelines. and even if staying in an enclosed space for an extended period is deemed one of the easiest ways to contract COVID-19. Howls of protest from surprised Metro Manila mayors led to the postponement of the plan to March 1. Chua does make a valid point on the urgent need to revive the economy. But that is not possible without mass vaccination, which means Mr. Duterte, who has unequivocally declared that the revival of the economy would hinge primarily on the availability of the vaccine, should take to task those in charge of the vaccination program, for the unacceptable delay in the vaccine roll-out. Read full story: opinion.inquirer.net   Copyright © 2020 PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: P.O. Box 2353, Makati Central Post Office, 1263 Makati City, Philippines.   Share    Tweet    Share    Forward  Preferences  |  Unsubscribe